Learning Quantum Mechanics with Dirac: Understanding Ket Vectors

Einstein's Cat
Messages
182
Reaction score
2
I'm attempting to learn the mathematics of quantum mechanics using textbooks such as "The Principles of Quantum Mechanics" by Dirac. I'm uncertain however of how ket vectors work! Say |A> + |B> = |C>, then what does |C> please represent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Einstein's Cat said:
I'm attempting to learn the mathematics of quantum mechanics using textbooks such as "The Principles of Quantum Mechanics" by Dirac. I'm uncertain however of how ket vectors work! Say |A> + |B> = |C>, then what does |C> please represent?

If you are not familiar with the mathematical concept of a "vector space", you'll want to check that out.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and bhobba
Einstein's Cat said:
I'm attempting to learn the mathematics of quantum mechanics using textbooks such as "The Principles of Quantum Mechanics" by Dirac.
Dirac is not easy to learn from. Try Ballentine.

I'm uncertain however of how ket vectors work! Say |A> + |B> = |C>, then what does |C> please represent?
If |A> and |B> denote possible states of a system, then the sum denotes another possible state of that system.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, DrClaude and bhobba
strangerep said:
Dirac is not easy to learn from. Try Ballentine.

I totally concur.

I actually learned it from Dirac and Von Neumann. I wish I didn't. It would be much better to start with Ballentine then read those two seminal texts.

I get the feeling though your math may not be up to Ballentine. In that case I suggest you work your way up in the following order:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0465062903/?tag=pfamazon01-20
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0071765638/?tag=pfamazon01-20
https://www.amazon.com/dp/146157675X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Then you can tackle Ballentine.

It may seem like a lot of work but remember its not a race. Take your time and cement your understanding.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes Tolklein, vanhees71 and DrClaude
Thank you all very much for your help
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top