Learning the Lagrangian/Hamiltonian

  • Thread starter Thread starter dreiter
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Supplementary materials for learning Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics include Taylor's "Classical Mechanics," which is praised for its clarity and accessibility, making it suitable for beginners. Users find it complements the more terse Thornton and Marion text effectively. The Schaum's outline is also recommended as an affordable resource. Overall, Taylor's book is considered a valuable tool for grasping complex concepts in classical mechanics. It is highly regarded for its explanatory style and ease of understanding.
dreiter
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I am taking undergrad classical mechanics this semester and we are using Thorton and Marrions Classical Dynamics book. It's rather terse IMO, and I am looking for some supplementary material to help learn L+H with. What does everybody recommend here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I used Taylor's "Classical Mechanics." It probably is not the most rigorous Classical Mechanics text around, but it is extremely well written and great for a first exposure to Calculus of Variations, and Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics.

Taylor is a great writer and explains things very well. I consider it the "Griffith's E&M" of Classical Mechanics texts.
 
G01 said:
I used Taylor's "Classical Mechanics." It probably is not the most rigorous Classical Mechanics text around, but it is extremely well written and great for a first exposure to Calculus of Variations, and Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics.

Taylor is a great writer and explains things very well. I consider it the "Griffith's E&M" of Classical Mechanics texts.

CFDFEAGURU said:
There is an inexpensive Schaum's outline.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0070692580/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Maybe that will help.

Thanks
Matt

Thanks guys!
 
I'll second Taylor's book. I bought it to supplement Marion and Thornton in my classical mechanics class, and there were many concepts that were explained MUCH better in Taylor.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top