Learning to Read Electrical Schematics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how individuals learn to read electrical schematics and gain an understanding of electrical engineering concepts. Participants share their personal experiences, resources, and methods for learning, including theoretical knowledge and practical applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to learn more about reading schematics and questions whether studying them would be beneficial.
  • Another suggests starting with basic components like resistors and filters, and emphasizes the importance of breaking down schematics into manageable parts.
  • Books are recommended as valuable resources, with specific mentions of hobbyist books from Radio Shack and the ARRL, as well as university textbooks for a more methodical approach.
  • A suggestion is made to use circuit simulation software like OrCAD's SPICE to complement learning, although it is noted that it should not be relied upon solely.
  • One participant shares their learning experience from the Navy and suggests building kits and projects as a practical way to learn.
  • Another participant proposes a unique approach of conceptualizing oneself as different electrical elements to better understand circuit behavior.
  • A participant recounts learning from their grandfather and finding a descriptive book on basic electronics that helped clarify their understanding of components and schematics.
  • A comment is made about maintaining civility in the discussion, indicating that there may have been some tension or disagreement among participants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants share various methods and resources for learning, but there is no consensus on a single best approach. Multiple perspectives on effective learning strategies remain, and some participants express differing views on the importance of theoretical versus practical knowledge.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for foundational knowledge before tackling schematics, while others emphasize hands-on experience. There are also varying opinions on the role of mathematics in understanding circuits, indicating differing assumptions about the prerequisites for learning.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in learning about electrical engineering, students seeking resources for understanding schematics, and hobbyists looking for practical advice on building electronics projects.

nile
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey all.

I was wondering how most people learn how to read schematics of electrical circuits and such (apologies for the undoubtably inaccurate terminology, I'm ignorant of these subjects).

I understand some very very very basic fundamentals about electricity, mostly garnered from various online sources. I'm at a bit of a rut, actually. I love to learn, I'm dying to learn/understand more, but I don't know where to turn. I ask about schematics specifically, because I think that studying them will help my understanding a bit. Do you think they wouldn't really help?

Another query: How did everyone here learn what they do about electrical engineering? College? Library books? Internet? A mentor?

Thanks :smile:
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
You pretty much have to learn schematics by learning bits and pieces first. Begin with components like the humble resistor divider, the RC filter, etc. and you'll eventually find yourself able to analyze a large schematic quickly by breaking it down into pieces.

Books, of course, are excellent. If you're just starting out, Radio Shack offers a line of hobbyist books that are known to be very good. The Amateur Radio Relay League (ARRL) also offers a number of easy-to-read books that are focused on developing the concepts of radio communication. University bookstores have tons of great books -- try to find one used in the school's first circuits class. These books will be more heavily methodical and mathematical than the other books I've mentioned, which may or may not please you. You don't necessarily need to learn any sophisticated mathematics to understand a circuit, but in some cases it can be a big help.

Also get a program like OrCAD's SPICE package. SPICE is a circuit simulator. You can draw up a schematic, even very complex ones, and then investigate its behavior by putting in test points and simulating it. You won't be able to learn much with it by itself, however, but it'll be a nice companion to whatever book you choose to read. A demo of the OrCAD suite is available here, and will probably meet all your needs: http://www.orcad.com/downloads/orcadlite10/default.asp

And, of course, getting a degree in electrical engineering is the ultimate way to learn electronics.

- Warren
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Uncle Sugar taught me how to read them when I was in the Navy.

I just wanted to add another way to learn is through putting kits togeater and building projects.
 
Last edited:
learn your theory, then pretend you are:
an electron and/ or voltage, and/ or current, and/ or resistance, and/ or reactance, and/ or power, and/ or a magnetic field... and see how you would, in this state, act in the circuit (given theoretical and practical limitations).(wow, two original thoughts in one day! self analyzing can be more fun than eating snakes!)
someday that whole personality thing may also come to the forefront (i doubt it, but do you think that makes three?)
 
Last edited:
Well, I have a grandfather that taught me a bit about electronics, so that's where I learned it. I went to Radioshack, and found a book on basic electronics, it was good. It brought electronics to a molecule level, was very desciptive, and had plenty of images. - always a good thing - Anyway, that's mainly where I learned a lot, but it also has a lot to do with understanding the components. For example, when I first started, if I saw a schematic, with a junction, I though...Maybe, electricity splitted up, and joined again at the end, each going through their own component, and combining their new values, this was wrong. Run-on sentence!
 
[edited] That's a-r-r-o-g-a-n-c-e... and I'm not sure why the thread warrants it. Please be civil.

-Russ
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
18K