Least competitive field of theoretical physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the competitiveness of various fields within theoretical physics, particularly focusing on theoretical condensed matter physics (CMP). The original poster suggests that CMP may be less competitive due to its practical applications and availability of funding, making it a potentially more accessible area for research. They express concerns about their own competitiveness in the field, given their age and health issues, and their desire to teach at a liberal arts college where they can engage students in meaningful discussions about quantum mechanics. Additionally, there is a mention of the potential for theorists to contribute significantly to biology, indicating an interdisciplinary opportunity for research and application.
bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3
Hi all, I'm wondering what field of theoretical physics is least competitive. I'm guessing it's one in which there is most funding available, and I'm further guessing that is theoretical condensed matter physics (CMP). I'm guessing that CMP research, theory namely, has results that are most practical and useful for industry, so there's prolly most research directed to this field. Am I right?

I ask because I'm just 1 year into the field of physics, trying to do a summer research project, and nearly 27 years old and I have some health problems that keep me from throwing myself into my studies with the same vigour I once did. I'm simply not competitive. I'm hoping I can just teach theory at a nice liberal arts college that still does a tiny bit of research so that at least 1-2 kids aren't A+ grubbing pre med students and are actually interested in Why Do We Need Quantum Mechanics?


thanks,
b
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are loads and loads of places a theorist could come in and make great progress in biology.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top