Least Prime Number for N=7999999999: Interval (x; x+100)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Little ant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the least prime number that divides 7999999999 and identifying the interval (x; x+100) for this prime. A participant mentions that the number is relatively small and can be quickly factored using the software Pari or a TI-89 calculator. The factorization process involves recognizing that 7999999999 can be expressed as 8*10^9 - 1. The conversation highlights the efficiency of mathematical tools in solving such problems. Overall, the thread emphasizes the ease of determining prime factors for large numbers using available technology.
Little ant
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
if N=7999999999 what are the least prime number, which divide to 7999999999? Or i which intervale is it?(intervale must be (x ; x+100)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
can u please elaborate the question a bit
 
Well, that's a fairly small number and Pari--a free program--gets that instantly. But, anyway to get started, look at 7999999999+ 1= 8*10^9-1 = (2^3)(10^9)-1.
 
TI-89 factors the number in just a few seconds.
 
Man, THANKS A LTO, YOU ARE SO GREAT¡¡¡¡¡
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top