Left-invariant vector field of the additive group of real number

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the left-invariant vector field of the additive group of real numbers, defined by left translations. The differential map shows that the left translation maintains the structure of the vector field, with the left-invariant vector field represented as the derivative with respect to x. The key point of confusion is whether the equality of the vector fields at different points, specifically L_{a*} X|_x = X|_{x+a}, holds true, which it does due to the nature of the additive group. The tangent vectors remain consistent across translations, confirming that the vector field is indeed left-invariant. Overall, the discussion highlights the properties of left-invariant vector fields in the context of real numbers.
AlbertEi
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I would like to understand the left-invariant vector field of the additive group of real number. The left translation are defined by
\begin{equation}
L_a : x \mapsto x + a \; , \;\;\; x,a \in G \subseteq \mathbb{R}.
\end{equation}
The differential map is
\begin{equation}
L_{a*} = \frac{\partial (x + a)}{\partial x} = 1,
\end{equation}
and the left-invariant vector field is
\begin{equation}
X = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}.
\end{equation}
So
\begin{equation}
L_{a*} X|_x = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}|_x.
\end{equation}
But I don't understand why
\begin{equation}
L_{a*} X|_x = X|_{x+a} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}|_{x+a}.
\end{equation}
This should be true if X is really a left-invariant vector field, right?

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The left translations map the line into itself. All the values on the number line are just moved over to the left a distance a. Therefore, the tangent vectors at each point are still $$\frac{\partial}{\partial x}$$ as they were before. The curve which was tangent to the real line at x (the real line itself) is the same curve which is tangent to the real line at x+a (again, the real line itself). This seems to me a pretty trivial result...I don't know if you were asking something deeper? o.O
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Oh, I thought that $a$ was a variable rather than a constant :shy:. Thanks for the reply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
994
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K