Left invertible mapping left inverse of matrix

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining if the given matrix mapping from R^2 to R^2 is left invertible and finding its left inverse. It is established that the mapping is one-to-one and onto, confirming its left invertibility. The proposed left inverse matrix is confirmed to be the same as the right inverse due to the square nature of the matrix. Participants discuss the implications of left and right invertibility, noting that if a mapping is both, it has a unique inverse. The conversation concludes with a request for theoretical proof regarding the uniqueness of inverses in such mappings.
fabbi007
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



relation from R^2-->R^2 ( R is real line)

(y1) [0 1] (x1)
(y2) =[-1 1] (x2)

is this left invertible?

if so what is the left inverse?

y1,y2 are element in a 2by 1 matrix, same with x1, x2. the elemenst 0,1,-1,1 are in a 2x2 matrix. I did no know how to represent a matrix here.


Homework Equations



A mapping is left invertible only if it is one-to-one

The Attempt at a Solution



The above relation is one-to-one because x is getting mapped into y with a 2 dimensional relation into a 2 dimensional space. If we solve this we get y1=x2; y2=-x1+x2. Hence I concluded it is left invertible. Also the mapping is onto, since the Range of the mapping is yielding Y.

I am not sure how I can find the left inverse now. Any ideas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this what you're trying to represent? \left(\begin{array}{c}y_1 \\ y_2 \end{array}\right) =<br /> \left( \begin{array}{c c} 0 &amp; 1 \\ -1 &amp; 1 \end{array}\right)<br /> \left(\begin{array}{c}x_1 \\ x_2 \end{array}\right)

Click on equation above to see the LaTeX code I used.

If we write your matrix equation as y = Ax, you can apply the left inverse to both sides to get A-1y = A-1Ax = x. In other words, you can use the left inverse to solve for x.

BTW, you should be posting these questions in the Calculus & Beyond section. The questions you are asking are math questions, not engineering.
 
Mark44 said:
I
If we write your matrix equation as y = Ax, you can apply the left inverse to both sides to get A-1y = A-1Ax = x. In other words, you can use the left inverse to solve for x.

BTW, you should be posting these questions in the Calculus & Beyond section. The questions you are asking are math questions, not engineering.

Thanks for the latex code Mark. This is from my electrical engineering course. Hence I posted here. Also, the above mapping is right invertible because from the definition the range=Y. Would there be different left inverse and right inverse for a mapping if it is both one-to-one and onto? My guess from left inverse is for the mapping would be

<br /> \left( \begin{array}{c c} 1 &amp; -1 \\ 1 &amp; 0 \end{array}\right)<br />

and since the mapping is right invertible too. the right inverse would be the same as left inverse, right?

<br /> \left( \begin{array}{c c} 1 &amp; -1 \\ 1 &amp; 0 \end{array}\right)<br />
 
Yeah, I think they would both be the same in this problem. I'm not certain on this, but I think that if you're dealing with square matrices, the left-inverse and right-inverse will be the same. Where I think this comes into play is when you're dealing with non-square matrices.
 
Mark44 said:
Yeah, I think they would both be the same in this problem. I'm not certain on this, but I think that if you're dealing with square matrices, the left-inverse and right-inverse will be the same. Where I think this comes into play is when you're dealing with non-square matrices.

Thanks Mark. I get it now. It is indeed a square matrix and there is only one inverse. Also since from definitions if a mapping is both left and right invertible then it has an inverse, meaning only one inverse.
 
Mark44 said:
Yeah, I think they would both be the same in this problem. I'm not certain on this, but I think that if you're dealing with square matrices, the left-inverse and right-inverse will be the same. Where I think this comes into play is when you're dealing with non-square matrices.

How can you prove that if a mapping F:X->Y is both left and right invertible that there exists only one left inverse and one right inverse. I am trying to understand the theory, I could understand the example though. Can you give me a hint?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K