Left invertible mapping left inverse of matrix

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mapping from R² to R² represented by a specific matrix. The original poster questions whether this mapping is left invertible and seeks to identify the left inverse, while also exploring the implications of the mapping being one-to-one and onto.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions for left invertibility and the relationship between left and right inverses for square matrices. There are attempts to clarify the representation of the matrix and its implications for the mapping's properties.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of left and right inverses, suggesting that they may be the same for square matrices. Others are exploring the theoretical aspects of invertibility and seeking clarification on the uniqueness of inverses under certain conditions.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original poster's background in electrical engineering, which may influence the context of the problem. Additionally, there is a suggestion that the question may be more appropriately placed in a different section of the forum.

fabbi007
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



relation from R^2-->R^2 ( R is real line)

(y1) [0 1] (x1)
(y2) =[-1 1] (x2)

is this left invertible?

if so what is the left inverse?

y1,y2 are element in a 2by 1 matrix, same with x1, x2. the elemenst 0,1,-1,1 are in a 2x2 matrix. I did no know how to represent a matrix here.


Homework Equations



A mapping is left invertible only if it is one-to-one

The Attempt at a Solution



The above relation is one-to-one because x is getting mapped into y with a 2 dimensional relation into a 2 dimensional space. If we solve this we get y1=x2; y2=-x1+x2. Hence I concluded it is left invertible. Also the mapping is onto, since the Range of the mapping is yielding Y.

I am not sure how I can find the left inverse now. Any ideas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this what you're trying to represent? \left(\begin{array}{c}y_1 \\ y_2 \end{array}\right) =<br /> \left( \begin{array}{c c} 0 &amp; 1 \\ -1 &amp; 1 \end{array}\right)<br /> \left(\begin{array}{c}x_1 \\ x_2 \end{array}\right)

Click on equation above to see the LaTeX code I used.

If we write your matrix equation as y = Ax, you can apply the left inverse to both sides to get A-1y = A-1Ax = x. In other words, you can use the left inverse to solve for x.

BTW, you should be posting these questions in the Calculus & Beyond section. The questions you are asking are math questions, not engineering.
 
Mark44 said:
I
If we write your matrix equation as y = Ax, you can apply the left inverse to both sides to get A-1y = A-1Ax = x. In other words, you can use the left inverse to solve for x.

BTW, you should be posting these questions in the Calculus & Beyond section. The questions you are asking are math questions, not engineering.

Thanks for the latex code Mark. This is from my electrical engineering course. Hence I posted here. Also, the above mapping is right invertible because from the definition the range=Y. Would there be different left inverse and right inverse for a mapping if it is both one-to-one and onto? My guess from left inverse is for the mapping would be

<br /> \left( \begin{array}{c c} 1 &amp; -1 \\ 1 &amp; 0 \end{array}\right)<br />

and since the mapping is right invertible too. the right inverse would be the same as left inverse, right?

<br /> \left( \begin{array}{c c} 1 &amp; -1 \\ 1 &amp; 0 \end{array}\right)<br />
 
Yeah, I think they would both be the same in this problem. I'm not certain on this, but I think that if you're dealing with square matrices, the left-inverse and right-inverse will be the same. Where I think this comes into play is when you're dealing with non-square matrices.
 
Mark44 said:
Yeah, I think they would both be the same in this problem. I'm not certain on this, but I think that if you're dealing with square matrices, the left-inverse and right-inverse will be the same. Where I think this comes into play is when you're dealing with non-square matrices.

Thanks Mark. I get it now. It is indeed a square matrix and there is only one inverse. Also since from definitions if a mapping is both left and right invertible then it has an inverse, meaning only one inverse.
 
Mark44 said:
Yeah, I think they would both be the same in this problem. I'm not certain on this, but I think that if you're dealing with square matrices, the left-inverse and right-inverse will be the same. Where I think this comes into play is when you're dealing with non-square matrices.

How can you prove that if a mapping F:X->Y is both left and right invertible that there exists only one left inverse and one right inverse. I am trying to understand the theory, I could understand the example though. Can you give me a hint?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K