Length Contraction & Relativistic Aberration: Is 1 Formula Enough?

Kevin Willis
Messages
25
Reaction score
3
I have been coding a speed of light simulator and I am having a bit of trouble with a few aspects of the project. My first question is:

Are the length contraction and relativistic aberration formulas BOTH needed in my calculations or does the relativistic aberration formula already account for the length contraction?​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to clarify what you are trying to calculate. The aberration formula is a self contained consequence of the Lorentz transform for angles of 'light rays'. If all you are interested is computing an image in one frame given that in another, this is all you need.
 
Kevin Willis said:
I have been coding a speed of light simulator and I am having a bit of trouble with a few aspects of the project. My first question is:

Are the length contraction and relativistic aberration formulas BOTH needed in my calculations or does the relativistic aberration formula already account for the length contraction?​
The effect of length contraction is of course included in the relativistic aberration formula. Nevertheless, as PAllen said, it may be useful to specify what case you simulate.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'

Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'

1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
View full post »

Thread '1-Way Speed of Light'

Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
View full post »

Thread 'How can a black hole absorb matter?'

According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Why does length contraction occur and how does it relate to time dilation?
2
Replies
63
Views
5K
I Relativistic length contraction
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Perceive Length Contraction VS Terrell Penrose
Replies
14
Views
2K
I Linear Accelerator Length Contraction
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Classical Aberration Formula: Understanding & Application
Replies
7
Views
1K
I Time difference caused by length contraction
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
I Is there a maximum relativistic acceleration?
Replies
29
Views
1K
I What causes time dilation and length contraction
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Question about length contraction
Replies
45
Views
5K
I Calculate Length Contraction for Accelerated Motion to Proxima Centauri
Replies
29
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top