MHB Length of a side, possible triangle side

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tsroll
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Triangle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem involving an isosceles triangle from a mathematics for machine technology book. To determine the lengths of sides A and B, it's crucial to recognize the triangle's isosceles nature. Side A can be calculated by adding 7 inches to half of the base, while side B requires finding the height of the triangle using the Pythagorean theorem. The height is derived from the formula involving the triangle's dimensions, leading to the calculation of side B. The thread emphasizes the importance of understanding triangle properties and applying relevant mathematical principles to solve the problem.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Tsroll said:
I have one question from my mathematics for machine technology book that has me stumped as well as my Father in-law, sister in-law and my accountant friend.

I wasn't sure if I was supposed to create a right triangle and use A² + B² = C²

Problem 18. B

http://s182.photobucket.com/user/da...1-499C-AF27-9DE175F5EF68_zps7ltszocb.jpg.html

First of all, you have to notice that the triangle is isosceles. This is important as the calculations wouldn't work out otherwise.

To find A, you need to add 7 inches to HALF of the base of the triangle.

To find B, you need to find the height of the triangle (if you draw in the height you will create two right-angle triangles, and you can use Pythagoras). Once you have the height of the triangle, subtract it from 17.823 inches.
 
As the triangle is isosceles I believe $A=7+0.5\times 30.263$

and $B=17.823 - h$ where $h$ is the height of the triangle. Have a go at finding it.
 
17.823 - √[(18.09)² - (30.263/2)²] = 7.909
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top