MHB Lengths of three segments of a triangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that if lengths \(x, y, z\) can form a triangle, then the lengths \(\frac{1}{x+z}, \frac{1}{y+z}, \frac{1}{x+y}\) can also form a triangle. Participants share different approaches to the proof, with one method highlighted as particularly effective. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the properties of triangle inequalities in both cases. The solutions presented are noted for their clarity and effectiveness in demonstrating the concept. Overall, the thread contributes valuable insights into triangle segment relationships.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
If $x,\,y,\,z$ are lengths of three segments which can form a triangle, show that the same is true for $\dfrac{1}{x+z},\,\dfrac{1}{y+z},\,\dfrac{1}{x+y}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
If $x,\,y,\,z$ are lengths of three segments which can form a triangle, show that the same is true for $\dfrac{1}{x+z},\,\dfrac{1}{y+z},\,\dfrac{1}{x+y}$.

we need to show that for arbritary sides of length x,y z
$\dfrac{1}{x+z} + \dfrac{1}{y+z}\gt \dfrac{1}{x+y}$
or $(y+z)(x+y) + (x+z)(x+y) \ge (x+z)(x+z)$
or simlifying
$x^2+y^2 + xy + yz + xz \ge z^2$

now
$x^2+y^2 + xy + yz + xz = z(x+y) + x^2+y^2 + xy$
$ \gt z(x+y) $
$\gt z^2$ as $x+y \gt z$

hence proved
 
kaliprasad said:
we need to show that for arbritary sides of length x,y z
$\dfrac{1}{x+z} + \dfrac{1}{y+z}\gt \dfrac{1}{x+y}$
or $(y+z)(x+y) + (x+z)(x+y) \ge (x+z)(x+z)$
or simlifying
$x^2+y^2 + xy + yz + xz \ge z^2$

now
$x^2+y^2 + xy + yz + xz = z(x+y) + x^2+y^2 + xy$
$ \gt z(x+y) $
$\gt z^2$ as $x+y \gt z$

hence proved

Very well done, kaliprasad! :cool: And thanks for participating!
 
Here is another solution of other that I want to share with MHB:

WLOG we can assume that $z\ge y \ge x$ so that $\dfrac{1}{x+y}\ge \dfrac{1}{z+x}\ge\dfrac{1}{y+z}$ and now, it remains to prove that $\dfrac{1}{y+z}+\dfrac{1}{z+x}>\dfrac{1}{x+y}$.

We have

$\dfrac{1}{y+z}+\dfrac{1}{z+x}-\dfrac{1}{x+y}=\dfrac{x^2+xy+y^2+z(x+y-z)}{(y+z)(z+x)(x+y)}>0$ since $x+y>z$ and the result follows.
Note that this is an identical approach to kaliprasad's, but written in a slightly different way.
 
Last edited:
anemone said:
Here is another solution of other that I want to share with MHB:

WLOG we can assume that $z\ge y \ge z$ so that $\dfrac{1}{x+y}\ge \dfrac{1}{z+x}\ge\dfrac{1}{y+z}$ and now, it remains to prove that $\dfrac{1}{y+z}+\dfrac{1}{z+x}>\dfrac{1}{x+y}$.

We have

$\dfrac{1}{y+z}+\dfrac{1}{z+x}-\dfrac{1}{x+y}=\dfrac{x^2+xy+y^2+z(x+y-z)}{(y+z)(z+x)(x+y)}>0$ since $x+y>z$ and the result follows.
Note that this is an identical approach to kaliprasad's, but written in a slightly different way.
There is a typo error in WLOG iline,
it should be $z\ge y \ge x $
Secondly we do not need WLOG line as
$x+y-z \gt 0$ for any x,y,z sides of the triangle
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top