Lennard-Jones potential for 3 atoms

barnflakes
Messages
156
Reaction score
4
If I have a 3 atom lattice laid out at positions ##x_1 = 1, x_2 = 2, x_3 = 3##

##x_1## and ##x_3## are stationary, but ##x_2## interacts with ##x_1## and ##x_3## via the Lennard-Jones interatomic potential.

I therefore worked out that the total acceleration for ##x_2## for ##m = \sigma = \epsilon = 1## is:a_2 = 24(2r_{21}^{-13} - r_{21}^{-7}) + 24(-2r_{32}^{-13} + r_{32}^{-7});

where ##r_{21} = |x_2 - x_1| , r_{32} = |x_3 - x_2|##

Is this correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, I assume that the in this particular case the Lennard-Jones potential is written as
$$
V_\mathrm{LJ}(r) = 4 \epsilon \left[ \left( \frac{\sigma}{r} \right)^{12} - \left( \frac{\sigma}{r} \right)^{6}
\right]
$$

barnflakes said:
Is this correct?
Yes, since
$$
a = \frac{F}{m} = \frac{1}{m} (- \nabla V)
$$

It is always good to make a sanity check. If ##r_{21} \rightarrow 0##, then atoms 1 and 2 are getting very close and the repulsive force dominates, so that should lead to an positive acceleration (i.e., to the right), and conversely for ##r_{32} \rightarrow 0##. The sign does appear to be correct.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top