Understanding Lenz's Law and Motional EMF in General Physics for Majors

AI Thread Summary
Lenz's Law states that an electromotive force (emf) is generated when there is a change in magnetic flux. Motional emf, on the other hand, can produce an emf without a change in flux. In physics problems, magnetic flux is defined as the product of the magnetic field strength, area, and the cosine of the angle between them. For most assignments, the flux will vary with time, requiring students to identify which variable (magnetic field, area, or angle) changes. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving related problems effectively.
SurrealityCheck
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
if someone could help me with understanding the basics of Lenz's law and Motional emf i'd really appreciate it. I'm having some trouble applying it to questions that were assigned.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you could ask a question we could work through it with you. Given what you told me all I could tell you is what lenz' law is, but you probably already know that.
 
SurrealityCheck said:
if someone could help me with understanding the basics of Lenz's law and Motional emf i'd really appreciate it. I'm having some trouble applying it to questions that were assigned.
With Lenz's law there is an emf produced when there is a changing in flux. A motional emf does not need a change of flux to produce an emf.

Pete
 
Assuming you are in the general physics for majors class, this is how you will be applying lenz's law:

First, let's define flux:

\Phi = \vec{B} \cdot \vec{A} = B*A*cos(\theta}

B is the field, A is the area (through which the flux passes).

In all of the problems you will be doing, the flux is a function of time. This means that either B or A or the angle between them is a function of time (rarely will more than one of these quantities be a function of time).

All of the problems consist of constructing this function and taking its derivative to get voltage. Please ask specific questions.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top