Lenz's Rule and Ferromagnetism

  • Thread starter Thread starter TP9109
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ferromagnetism
AI Thread Summary
Lenz's law applies to ferromagnetic rings similarly to non-ferromagnetic materials, as both involve the induction of opposing magnetic fields. However, ferromagnetic objects typically have lower conductivity, resulting in smaller eddy currents compared to non-ferromagnetic materials. This means that while Lenz's law is still in effect, the ferromagnetic ring would not slow down as effectively and could instead become a projectile due to its shape and magnetic properties. The discussion emphasizes that the dynamics of motion differ significantly between the two types of materials. Understanding these differences is crucial for safety in environments with strong magnetic fields.
TP9109
Messages
8
Reaction score
8
Hi,
In this video: , it shows someone with an aluminium ring next to an MRI scanner. He allows the ring to fall over and it falls slowly demonstrating Lenz's law. I understand this but was wondering what would happen if a ferromagnetic ring was used instead of the non-ferromagnetic aluminium ring used in the video.
Obviously I know it would be dangerous and would be attracted to the scanner, but with regards to Lenz's law, in my mind as it accelerates quickly towards the scanner, it would undergo changes in magnetic field so wouldn't a powerful induced magnetic field be induced in the ring (Lenz's law) as it is flying towards the scanner that acts in the opposite direction to the scanner's field?
In other words I am basically asking whether Lenz's law works exactly the same with a ferromagnetic ring as it does with the non-ferromagnetic ring in the video. Because if it does then would you not
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TP9109 said:
Summary:: Lenz's law with a ferromagnetic object.

In other words I am basically asking whether Lenz's law works exactly the same with a ferromagnetic ring as it does with the non-ferromagnetic ring in the video.
Lenz’s law does work with a ferromagnetic object.

The key principle demonstrated in this video is actually eddy currents being formed through Faraday's law and Ohm's law. Lenz's law is just the minus sign in Faraday's law, which is what makes it so that the eddy currents work to slow the motion rather than to accelerate it.

For ferromagnetic objects the conductivity is lower so eddy currents are smaller. Also, ferromagnetic objects are usually not a good shape for forming large eddy currents. So the result is that ferromagnetic objects often become projectiles instead of moving slowly.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top