Art Can We Make History and Dance Together on October 25th?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jobyts
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the global event "Thrill the World," which invites participants to perform Michael Jackson's "Thriller" dance simultaneously on October 25th. The event aims to set a Guinness World Record for the largest simultaneous dance. Participants express enthusiasm for joining the event, with some indicating challenges due to geographical limitations, such as being located in the Philippines. The conversation also includes an invitation for community members to connect and participate in this unique celebration of Michael Jackson's legacy.
jobyts
Messages
226
Reaction score
60
Let's all dance together :)

Thrill the world: worldwide simultaneous dance of MJ's Thriller on this oct 25th.
http://www.thrilltheworld.com/events/info/thrill_the_world_2009/official_events


Can we all PFers meet here? I plan to go for it. This could be my only way to get into a Guinness record.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org


hi newbie here...

i would love to dance..MJ is my idol...but that would be impossible...am here in the philippines.
__________
http://www.waterfeatures.co.uk"
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Sounds intersting!
wl59i9.gif
 

Thread 'Songs that pay homage to deceased artists, no covers'

There is a neighboring thread Cover songs versus the original track, which ones are better? https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cover-songs-versus-the-original-track-which-ones-are-better.1050205/ which is an endless subject and as colorful are the posts there. I came across a Buddy Holly cover by Eva Cassidy only to find out that the Buddy Holly song was already a Paul Anka cover. Anyway, both artists who had covered the song have passed far too early in their lives. That gave me the...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the plural for moose not meese?'

The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
View full post »

Similar threads

B Thinking about a calendar epoch based on the field of physics
Replies
49
Views
5K
The Scientist as Hero - or not
Replies
1
Views
3K
QM and Determinism: Can We Predict the Future?
2
Replies
68
Views
7K
Is there a limit to Human Lifespans?
Replies
4
Views
5K
Still confusion in relativity of simultaneity and time dilation .
Replies
13
Views
3K
Has information been lost to a black hole?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Has information been lost to a black hole?
Replies
10
Views
2K
LHC about to restart - some frequently asked questions
2
Replies
69
Views
14K
Three Mile Island 25th Anniversary Actions
Replies
3
Views
5K
I Progress In Calculating The HLbL Contribution To Muon g-2
Replies
0
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top