Lie group (additional condition)

namlessom
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Does somebody know an example of a differentiable manifold which is a group but NOT a Lie group? So the additional condition: the group operations multiplication and inversion are analytic maps, is not satisfied.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, but they aren't particularly natural.

Let M be any differential manifold. Let G be any group such that card(M)=card(G). Let f be any bijection of the underlying sets. Then F makes M into a group by fiat, and in general, if we pick f in completely arbitrary fashion, it will not be a lie group.

More natural ones do not immediately spring to mind, sorry.
 


One example of a differentiable manifold that is a group but not a Lie group is the Heisenberg group. The Heisenberg group is a three-dimensional manifold that is the set of 3x3 upper triangular matrices with real entries, where the group operation is matrix multiplication. However, the group operations of multiplication and inversion are not analytic maps, as they involve taking square roots of negative numbers, which is not allowed in real analytic functions. Therefore, the Heisenberg group satisfies the conditions of a differentiable manifold and a group, but not the additional condition of having analytic group operations, making it a non-Lie group.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top