Lifegazer's Departure: PF Staff & Self Discontinue Member Status

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The PF staff has decided to discontinue Lifegazer's member status due to his negative impact on the forums, despite having no hard feelings towards him. His posts required excessive moderation, which became burdensome for the Mentors, leading to this decision. While some members expressed sadness over his departure, others supported the ban, citing Lifegazer's refusal to learn from corrections and his promotion of flawed ideas, particularly in scientific discussions. The conversation also touched on the need for consistent moderation across the forum and the challenges of managing diverse opinions. Ultimately, Lifegazer is encouraged to engage in other forums, as he is not banned from participating in discussions elsewhere.
  • #31
haha, does that site still exist? I remember when we all got emailed and told that 'PF has moved! Come to this site!'

I remember greg emailed the owner of the site and sorted them out.

Anyway, if you happen to come back and read this thread lifegazer, good luck, have fun. See you sometime in the strange world that is the internet...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I don't believe it. I left PF fer a few months to concentrate on my Mid-year assessment and so many things happened. The worst part is that i missed them all.
 
  • #33
If you miss Lifegazer, he can also found hanging out at sciforums.com
 
  • #34
But that site has only 32 members...and it stinks. Why would Lifegazer want to go there? Sciforums I could see, they have a site similar to PF and have many members. But how interesting can this evil twin of physics forums be? It has only 21 topics and 32 members!
 
Last edited:
  • #36
No, sorry that post I made was kind of unclear. I mean the website that Zargawee posted has only 32 members. I said Sciforums I could see (as in I could see lifegazer going to) because
they have a site similar to PF and have many members

I will edit my post to be less confusing. go tot he site Zargawee posted to see what i am talking about.
 
Last edited:
  • #37
Originally posted by Shadow
No, sorry that post I made was kind of unclear. I mean the website that Tom posted has only 32 members. I said Sciforums I could see (as in I could see lifegazer going to) because

No, I posted a link to SciForums. You are talking about the link that Zargawee posted.
 
  • #38
Ahhh...sorry that explains a lot.
 
  • #40
I noticed the "banned" text next to LG's username, so I assumed that's what happened. Now all that's left is sciforums...
 
Last edited:
  • #42
Poor LG ! :frown:

I remember we had some interesting discussions,
it's amazing how many different effecient and fascinating
insights one can produce to justify a totally disonnceted,
hopeless and not even defined idea.

Oh well... I suppose this is for his own good too... :wink:
 

Similar threads

Announcement Official Response to "Allegations of AI misuse in PF"
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
PF Betterment Survey Staff Responses
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
What staff changes are happening at PF?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
Suggestion In search of the faces behind the usernames
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
What Were the Early Days of PF Like for Members in the Twenty-Year+ Club?
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
6K
Announcement Farewell to @Astronuc, Welcome @anorlunda to PF Mentors!
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Goodbye Micromass: PF Staff Member Retires
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
What is the Legacy of PF Member Jim Hardy?
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
16K
Strict forum rules vs learning science
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Welcome Back Hootenanny! bcrowell Leaves Staff
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K