Lifting an Object: Work, Force, and Cosine

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jonasrosa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lift Work
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
12 replies · 3K views
jonasrosa
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
If W= F*d*cos(θ), is it just going to be 0?
So, from what I remember, W=F*D*cos (θ). If I'm lifting, θ=90° and so, the cos = 0. So is the work just 0? Why? I still moved the object through a distance, which is the usual non-mathematical definition of Work.
 
on Phys.org
Welcome to PF. :smile:

How are you defining ##\theta## ? Work is force multiplied by distance through the path of the applied force. When you are lifting something, what is the direction and path of the applied force?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and jonasrosa
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF. :smile:

How are you defining ##\theta## ? Work is force multiplied by distance through the path of the applied force. When you are lifting something, what is the direction and path of the applied force?
Ok, so, from what I remember ##\theta##? was the angle between the force and the object (meaning the angle at which I'm moving rhe object). So, horizontal movement would be a 0° angle and vertical would be 90°. It's been quite a while since I've studied physics, so I'm very rusty, but I was studying work today and I remember seeing this formula and it got me confused
 
Yeah, so it sounds like you're trying to apply a "formula" for a situation where the variables are not defined correctly. It's better to try to understand the vector definition of Work, instead of trying to apply simplified formulas without understanding where they come from.

Have you had any introduction to vectors yet in your learning?
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, topsquark and erobz
$$ W = \int \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{s}$$
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
jonasrosa said:
Ok, so, from what I remember ##\theta##? was the angle between the force and the object (meaning the angle at which I'm moving rhe object). So, horizontal movement would be a 0° angle and vertical would be 90°. It's been quite a while since I've studied physics, so I'm very rusty, but I was studying work today and I remember seeing this formula and it got me confused
You’ve got the angles backwards. To lift an object you apply a vertical force, not a horizontal one. The angle between force and displacement when lifting straight up is therefore zero.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and russ_watters
berkeman said:
Yeah, so it sounds like you're trying to apply a "formula" for a situation where the variables are not defined correctly. It's better to try to understand the vector definition of Work, instead of trying to apply simplified formulas without understanding where they come from.

Have you had any introduction to vectors yet in your learning?
I have, but it was over 5 years ago. I am trying to understand what the formula means and why it doesn't apply on this situation or what am I misinterpreting, because once I realized this, it felt very weird
 
Orodruin said:
You’ve got the angles backwards. To lift an object you apply a vertical force, not a horizontal one. The angle between force and displacement when lifting straight up is therefore zero.
Ok, I think I get it. So, what matters is the angle of the force in relation to the movement? So, if I'm applying vertical force to move something vertically, the angle is 0 and if I apply horizontal force to move something horizontally, the angle is also 0?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
jonasrosa said:
Ok, I think I get it. So, what matters is the angle of the force in relation to the movement? So, if I'm applying vertical force to move something vertically, the angle is 0 and if I apply horizontal force to move something horizontally, the angle is also 0?
Yes.
 
PeroK said:
Yes.
Ok, now it makes sense. Thanks a lot.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
jonasrosa said:
Ok, now it makes sense. Thanks a lot.
FYI, this would all be a lot clearer if you drew a diagram and labeled the force, direction of motion and angle.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
russ_watters said:
FYI, this would all be a lot clearer if you drew a diagram and labeled the force, direction of motion and angle.
Yes, probably. Didn't think of doing that. Thanks a lot
 
jonasrosa said:
Ok, I think I get it. So, what matters is the angle of the force in relation to the movement? So, if I'm applying vertical force to move something vertically, the angle is 0 and if I apply horizontal force to move something horizontally, the angle is also 0?
Also, realize that if the force is opposed to the motion such as a block is moving to the right but a force on it points to the left, the angle is 180° and the cosine is -1. That means the block is slowing down.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters