Lifting boxes of different sizes

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter warehouseworker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lifting
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of lifting boxes of different sizes and weights, particularly focusing on the relationship between force, torque, and the distance from the body when lifting. Participants explore the implications of these factors on physical exertion and safety in a labor context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether it takes more force to lift a larger box due to the weight being further away, assuming weight is equally distributed.
  • Another participant asserts that the force required to lift a box is determined solely by its mass and gravitational attraction, suggesting that while torque may increase, the gravitational force remains constant.
  • A different perspective emphasizes that lifting larger boxes requires more torque, which can lead to increased muscle stress and energy expenditure, raising concerns about back health and safety.
  • One participant agrees that while the gravitational force is constant, the force exerted by muscles increases when lifting larger objects held further away, due to the mechanics of torque.
  • Examples are provided to illustrate how leverage can affect the forces involved in lifting, suggesting that proper technique can minimize the muscular force required.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between force, torque, and the mechanics of lifting. There is no consensus on whether larger boxes require more force to lift, as some focus on gravitational force while others emphasize the implications of torque and muscle exertion.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the complexities of lifting mechanics, including the roles of torque and leverage, without resolving the mathematical or physical nuances involved in these concepts.

warehouseworker
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Okay so 8n college I majored in math but throughout my education never had a real physics course. Now I currently have a labor j9b lifting boxes. At the warehouse we separate heavier boxes based solely on wieght and not size. So I was wondering does (assuming wieght is equally distributed) does it take more force to lift a larger box since the wieght would be further away from you?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it does not take more force. Force (as matters to this question) only involves the mass and the gravitational attraction to the Earth (acceleration due to gravity). Yes, there are a ton of forces actually acting on the box (ie friction, electromagnetic, etc), but the only one that matters here is gravitational force. It may require greater torque, which is equal to the force perpendicular times radius of the moment arm. This requires more mechanical energy, or more work.
 
warehouseworker said:
Okay so 8n college I majored in math but throughout my education never had a real physics course. Now I currently have a labor j9b lifting boxes. At the warehouse we separate heavier boxes based solely on wieght and not size. So I was wondering does (assuming wieght is equally distributed) does it take more force to lift a larger box since the weight would be further away from you?

The main issue is the increased torque you need to generate for a given weight that is held farther away from your body. That puts stress on some of your muscles, which does require more calories to be burned. It also places your back's health more at risk, the larger and larger the boxes get for a given weight. At some point you will need two people to make it a safe lift.
 
I would answer yes. Post #2 was about the force applied to the box to counter gravity, but I don't think that's the force the OP is interested in: I think the OP is interested in the force(s) exerted by his muscles. And a physically larger object does absolutely require you to generate more force to lift it if you have to hold it further away from your body due to its bulk. That additional force is from the torque(s) involved. Indeed, if you use leverage properly, you can in some instances decrease the forces applied by your muscles to zero or near zero (consider, standing).

Consider if you hold a small object at arms-length away from you. Say your arm is 2' long and the object weighs 1 lb. That's 2 ft-lb of torque applied even if you exclude the weight of your arm. If the knob of your shoulder that provides the fulcrum and leverage for muscle action is 2" in diameter, that's 12 lb of force applied.

Now bend your elbow and hold the object half as far away. Now the torque at your shoulder is cut in half and the force applied by your deltoid muscle is therefore cut in half (an additional force is now applied by your bicep).

Now place the object on your shoulder. How much force does your deltoid apply to your shoulder now?

Lift with leverage. If you've ever wrestled or taken judo, you know that the throws tend to be less impressive than they look because they take advantage of leverage and requrie surprisingly little strength.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: warehouseworker

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K