Light Barrier: Breaking the Speed of Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter waznboyd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Barrier Light
waznboyd
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi, just got into the topic of relativity and got curious. Is it possible to break the light barrier similiarly to the sound barrier? I have just found an article that someone had done it. http://www.lastek.com.au/light.htm What are your views on this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
waznboyd said:
Hi, just got into the topic of relativity and got curious. Is it possible to break the light barrier similiarly to the sound barrier? I have just found an article that someone had done it. http://www.lastek.com.au/light.htm What are your views on this?
It should be impossible for a message (information) or energy or particles to travel faster than light. But waves can travel faster than light--as an analogy, imagine a long row of people on a giant bench "doing the wave", with each person having a pre-arranged time to stand, you could easily arrange things so that two people 1 light-year apart would stand up less than a year apart, so the wave of people standing would travel faster than light.

This article goes into more detail on the experiment you linked to, and why it does not conflict with relativity, if you're interested.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
waznboyd said:
Hi, just got into the topic of relativity and got curious. Is it possible to break the light barrier similiarly to the sound barrier? I have just found an article that someone had done it. http://www.lastek.com.au/light.htm What are your views on this?

This account is highly misleading. They did NOT send signals faster than light; they exploited a strange medium that permitted them to "invert" the leading edge and the trailing edge of the signal envelope so the trailing edge came out of the medium before the leading edge. There was a lot of hoo-hah about the experiment at the time (2000) and it was eventually straightened out. Relativity does not allow massive objects to travel faster than light.

That said, in an ordinary medium like water light is slowed down, and there it is possible for a fast moving particle to outstrip its own light. When that happens you get an optical equivalent of the sonic boom that accompanies breaking the sound barrier. This is called "Cerenkov radiation"
(the C in Cerenkov is supposed to have a little v-mark over it to indicate it's pronounced like the ch in chair: CHAIR-en-koff).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the information guys, this proves to be very interesting indeed.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top