Light - electromagnetic frequency

AI Thread Summary
When two light sources with the same electromagnetic frequency of 200 THz are combined, the resulting frequency remains at 200 THz, not 400 THz. To achieve a frequency of 400 THz, a special nonlinear material is required to convert the frequency, which does not occur naturally. The analogy of temperatures illustrates that frequencies do not simply add together; instead, combining light sources increases intensity without altering frequency. Visible light color corresponds to frequency, so shining two red lights results in brighter red, not blue. Understanding these principles clarifies the behavior of light and frequency interactions.
symbiont
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hi Guys,

if i have 2 sources of "light" that both have an electromagnetic frequency of 200 THz (infrared/invisible).

- now, if i shine both of them into my eye at the same time, will i see light at a frequency of 400 THz?

greetings...




( ps: I'm not going to try this and i suspect that it is dangerous and not possible, just mainly want to know why )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.

If you combine two "lights" that have the same frequency, the result will have the same frequency as well. So, in your example, still at 200 THz.

To get double the frequency, you would need a special nonlinear material to convert the 200 THz into 400 THz. This can be done, but again it requires a special material, it does not just happen as a matter of course.
 
No. The reason is "why should it?" If it's 70 degrees in Los Angeles and 50 degrees in San Francisco, it's not 120 degrees in California. There's no reason to add temperatures and there is no reason to add frequencies.
 
For visible radiation, the frequency is the color of the radiation. If you shine two red lights into your eye, you won't see blue, you just see red at double the intensity. When you add two beams together, you get double the intensity, not double the frequency. Well, that's not completely true, if its like a laser beam, then you can have phase cancelling, but if the beam has a mix of frequencies in a large enough range around the center frequency, then it will pretty much add up intensities.
 
thanks for the interesting answers


Redbelly98 - didn't know that there were materials that could do that, that's just the kind of information i was looking for... thanks

Vanadium 50 - i understand what you mean but i guess you kind of missed the point of my question

Rap - i will think about that thanks


sorry for the late reply, i was distracted.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top