Light energy, just like time, is relative?

Aspchizo
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Gravity and speed through space has an effect on time.

Increased gravity = slower time
Increased speed = slower time

When we look out at the stars and measure their spectrum, we see a red shift. This red shift is the result of the increase in the distance between the source of the light and us, otherwise known as the expanding of space.

So if we were to fly towards a star, as we increase our speed, the light should shift more and more. Eventually it would pass down through the spectrum to gamma rays, and our space shuttle would be torn apart by the immensly high energy gamma rays.

So the speed of light remains constant, but as you increase your speed towards the source of the light, your perception of time is slowed and the energy of the light shifts.

Anything wrong with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aspchizo said:
Gravity and speed through space has an effect on time.

This is not incorrect, but it is relative; when you say someone's time is slower, you have to specify what it is slower relative to. No one perceives their own time to be slower; everyone experiences their own time flowing at the same rate.

Aspchizo said:
When we look out at the stars and measure their spectrum, we see a red shift. This red shift is the result of the increase in the distance between the source of the light and us, otherwise known as the expanding of space.

That's one way of looking at it--the light gets stretched out as it travels through expanding space. But it's not the only way of looking at it; another is that it's just a Doppler redshift, caused by the fact that the source of the light is moving away from us--it's due to relative velocity, not light stretching out. These are not incompatible explanations; they're just different ways of looking at the same process.

Ned Wright's cosmology tutorial has a good discussion of this:

http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_02.htm

Aspchizo said:
So if we were to fly towards a star, as we increase our speed, the light should shift more and more. Eventually it would pass down through the spectrum to gamma rays, and our space shuttle would be torn apart by the immensly high energy gamma rays.

Yes, this is true, because the Doppler blueshift in frequency (blueshift because you're now moving towards the light source, rather than away) corresponds to a shift in energy, since energy is just Planck's constant divided by frequency.

Aspchizo said:
So the speed of light remains constant

Yes.

Aspchizo said:
as you increase your speed towards the source of the light, your perception of time is slowed

No; see above. Another observer moving relative to you might say that your time is slowed, but you yourself perceive no difference in your own flow of time.

Aspchizo said:
and the energy of the light shifts.

Yes.
 
Thanks for clarification. Also, I never meant to imply that we perceive a change in time, it is relative to someone else.
 
also, energy in all its forms is relative (whether it is contained in the electric field, or some other way). google four-momentum, or also, the stress-energy tensor.
 
PeterDonis said:
Yes, this is true, because the Doppler blueshift in frequency (blueshift because you're now moving towards the light source, rather than away) corresponds to a shift in energy, since energy is just Planck's constant divided by frequency.

Hi Peter. Surely you mean Planck's constant *times" frequency.
 
Saw said:
Surely you mean Planck's constant *times" frequency.

Yes, you're right. :redface:
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top