Light Intensity Model: Showing Minimal Difference at Off Point

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling light intensity at a specific point when one of the overhead bulbs is switched off. It emphasizes the importance of distance between the light sources and the desk, referencing the inverse square law to explain how light intensity diminishes with distance. If the desk is far from the lights, turning off one bulb results in a minimal reduction in illumination, approximately 1/9. Conversely, if the desk is closer, the effect of switching off the bulb is more pronounced. Participants seek further resources to better understand the physics involved in this scenario.
S.1.B
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can someone assist with a simple model for the following question? I have looked on the net but cannot find anything on it.

Say you are sat at a desk with the light bulb directly above you switched off and the rest on; so:

on - on - on
on - off - on
on - on - on

Each at distance r apart with the light intensity at each point the same (say I)

I wish to model the intensity of light at the off point and show that just switching the bulb at this point will have very little difference to the intensity of light here point regardless if the bulb at that piont was switched on or off.

I wish to double check my working to see if I am on the right track. Many thanks,
 
Science news on Phys.org
It depends on how far the desk is from the array of lights. If far away (compared to r) turning off 1 light reduces the illumination by 1/9. If close to array it will be more. Essentially you need to use the inverse square law.
 
mathman said:
It depends on how far the desk is from the array of lights. If far away (compared to r) turning off 1 light reduces the illumination by 1/9. If close to array it will be more. Essentially you need to use the inverse square law.

Thank you for your reply. How did you come to this result? I am very rusty on my Physics at the moment.

Lets say the distance between the each light is fixed and at r distance apart. The height distance is h; if I have understood your reply and I failed to consider that aspect. I do not think that would be a major issue though.

Can you refer me to a link or a book that explains the above scenario. I cannot find one at present that explains what I am trying to solve,

 
S.1.B said:
Can someone assist with a simple model for the following question? I have looked on the net but cannot find anything on it.

Say you are sat at a desk with the light bulb directly above you switched off and the rest on; so:

on - on - on
on - off - on
on - on - on

Each at distance r apart with the light intensity at each point the same (say I)

I wish to model the intensity of light at the off point and show that just switching the bulb at this point will have very little difference to the intensity of light here point regardless if the bulb at that piont was switched on or off.

I wish to double check my working to see if I am on the right track.Many thanks,

S.1.B said:
Thank you for your reply. How did you come to this result? I am very rusty on my Physics at the moment.

Lets say the distance between the each light is fixed and at r distance apart. The height distance is h; if I have understood your reply and I failed to consider that aspect. I do not think that would be a major issue though.

Can you refer me to a link or a book that explains the above scenario. I cannot find one at present that explains what I am trying to solve,

Just search on "Inverse Square Law" for light. mathman's point is that if the ceiling with the lights is 10cm over your head, switching on the middle bulb 10cm over your head will increase the light for you quite a bit. If the ceiling is several meters away, you will see a smaller increase in intensity.
 
Intensity of each light source is proportional to \frac{1}{d^2}. Total illumination is sum over all sources. Overhead d^2=h^2, four nearest to overhead - each d^2=h^2+r^2, four corners - each d^2=h^2+2r^2.
 
Thanks both for your help.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top