Light intensity profile along all radial distances

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on estimating the intensity profile of a collimated light beam as it diverges over distance. The intensity decreases with increasing radial distance, following the inverse square law beyond the Radiation Near Field. Key concepts include the Rayleigh Distance, which is defined as the diameter of the source squared divided by twice the wavelength (λ). The discussion also introduces the Airy pattern, which describes the intensity distribution of a circular aperture light source.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the inverse square law in physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of the Radiation Near Field
  • Knowledge of Rayleigh Distance calculations
  • Basic principles of light diffraction and Airy patterns
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Rayleigh Distance formula and its applications in optics
  • Study the characteristics of the Airy pattern and its significance in light intensity distribution
  • Explore the inverse square law in various contexts, including electromagnetic radiation
  • Investigate methods for measuring light intensity profiles in non-laser beams
USEFUL FOR

Optics researchers, physicists, and engineers involved in light propagation analysis, as well as anyone interested in understanding the behavior of collimated light beams.

XLAYZ
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have an ordinary light (not laser) collimated to produce a parallel beam. After traveling a distance in air, the beam has diverged significantly. The intensity decreases as the radial distance increases. Now I need to estimate the intensity profile along all radial distances inside the beam. All what I found was about laser beam and Gaussian beam, it is not the same thing. Could anyone please show me what theory and which formula I need to use?

Thank you in advance!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Once we are more than a certain distance from the source (the boundary of the Radiation Near Field), the intensity falls with the inverse square law. This applies along any radial.
The boundary of the radiation Near Field is quite indistinct, and for a collimated beam is sometimes given as the Rayleigh Distance = diameter of source^2 / 2 lambda.
The same applies to laser beams, radio beams and microwave beams, water waves etc.
 
When you say "radial" which radius do you mean? The radius ##R## of a sphere centered at the source or the radius ##r## of the circular spot of collimated light at distance ##R## from the source?
 
kuruman said:
When you say "radial" which radius do you mean? The radius ##R## of a sphere centered at the source or the radius ##r## of the circular spot of collimated light at distance ##R## from the source?
Sorry, I mean the radial distance from the axis of the beam with circular cross section.
 
Sorry, I had misunderstood the meaning of"radius". If the radiating aperture is circular and uniformly illuminated, we see a tapered central lobe, followed by a succession of nulls and gradually diminishing peaks, known as sidelobes. This is called an Airy pattern, named after the former Astronomer Royal. See Wiki, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Side_lobe
Close to the antenna, within the radiation near zone, the beam is essentially parallel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
945
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K