B Light Momentum Confusion: Proving with Math/Eqns

Irfan Nafi
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
In E2=m2c4+p2c2
how do you prove light has momentum? I've tried but my answer comes to be undefined. Light has m=0, so you're left with p2c2. p=(mv)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) When substituting values of light you get that p=0/0. How do you prove light has momentum using math and equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The expression for momentum for photons in QM is ##p=\hbar k##. Where ##k## is the wave number (##k=\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}##) and ##\hbar## is the Planck constant divided by ##2\pi## . Or equivalently, ##p=\frac{h}{\lambda}## . Your equation for ##p## is for massive particles with non zero rest mass.
Edit: Also note that in your expression for p if you put v=c (photon) then you get a division by zero! It is good to check for these stuff when you are doing calculations.
Edit 2: Sorry I thought that this was posted in QM section. Apologies.
 
  • Like
Likes Irfan Nafi
In relativity, p is not necessarily obtained by multiplying mass by velocity.

For a photon, instead we work with the four-momentum, the first component ##p^0## of which, in any reference frame, is the energy of the photon in that frame. The other three components ##p^1,p^2,p^3## are momenta in the directions of the three spatial axes of the frame. We want the four-momentum to be a null vector (vector of zero magnitude), because light travels along null geodesics. So that means that not all the other three components of the four momentum can be zero - since the first component (Energy) ##p^0## is nonzero. If we rotate the frame so that the x spatial axis points in the direction of the photon's travel, we know that the other two momentum components ##p^2,p^3## must be zero, and we conclude that ##p^1=p^0## where ##p^0=E=h\nu## is the photon's energy.
 
Irfan Nafi said:
p=(mv)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
This is a relation that only holds fot massive particles. You cannot use it for light.

Irfan Nafi said:
I've tried but my answer comes to be undefined. Light has m=0, so you're left with p2c2
Yes, and so you are done. If light carries energy, then it carries momentum p=E/c.

Irfan Nafi said:
How do you prove light has momentum using math and equations?

You don't. This is not how physics works, it is an empirical science. Your theory makes a prediction and you test it in the lab.
 
  • Like
Likes Irfan Nafi
andrewkirk said:
instead we work with the four-momentum
I strongly suspect that this will pass over the head of the OP in a B level thread ...
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top