Light Refraction: How it Colors Our Sky

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Refraction Sky
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of light refraction and its relationship to the color of the sky, specifically emphasizing Rayleigh scattering as the primary cause of the blue sky. Participants clarify that the scattering of light is influenced by dipole moments in atmospheric molecules, with intensity proportional to (1/λ)4, leading to stronger scattering of shorter wavelengths. The conversation also touches on the similarities between scattering and refraction, highlighting that both involve interactions between photons and electrons, though they are distinct processes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Rayleigh scattering and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with dipole moments and their role in light interaction
  • Basic knowledge of electromagnetic (EM) theory and non-relativistic scattering
  • Concept of polarization in scattered light
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of Rayleigh scattering and its implications for atmospheric optics
  • Explore the relationship between dipole moments and electromagnetic wave interactions
  • Study the Larmor radiation formula and its application in light scattering
  • Investigate the effects of polarization in atmospheric phenomena and its visual implications
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, atmospheric scientists, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of light behavior in the atmosphere and its effects on sky coloration.

Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
What does light refraction have to do with the sky being blue (or any color for that matter)?

Thanks for any replies.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Our perception of a blue sky has more to do with Rayleigh scattering than refraction. Due to dipole moments in the molecules that make up the atmosphere, incident light (from the sun) is scattered. The intensity of this scattering is proportional to (1/λ)4, so that shorter wavelengths are scattered more strongly. (Since the eye has cones that detect red, green, and blue light, the net effect is that we perceive the sky to be blue.)
 
jamesrc,

Thanks for the reminder. Can you further detail the dipole mechanism of Rayleigh scattering? (Isn't scattering a type of refraction?)
 
I guess from the standpoint of photon-electron interaction, reflection, refraction, and scattering are all similar/the same. But yeah, I think that refraction is the result of the combined scattering by the individual molecules of some material. Since these molecules are arranged in some structure, that combination results in the refracted beam and the reflected beam (radiation in other directions destructively interferes). Beyond that, I'm not really qualified to comment; what I said may even be off base.

As far as the scattering in the skies goes, here's what I remember from my undergrad EM course:
we're dealing with a non-relativistic situation where the scattering radius is on the order of the Bohr radius, which << than the wavelength of visible light. The dipoles in the molecules of the atmosphere are driven by the electric field in the incident wave, and the scattered light comes out polarized. So you end up with the Larmor radiation formula with that &omega;4 dependence. I was going to try to transcirbe my old notes, but
this has the same stuff only with better organization.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 207 ·
7
Replies
207
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K