Light Speed Invariance: Experiments, Difficulties & Clarification

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the invariance of the speed of light as it relates to observers, particularly whether there are experiments that demonstrate this invariance independent of the motion of the observer. Participants explore the implications of Special Relativity (SR) and the equivalence of source and observer motion, while questioning the existence of direct experimental evidence for these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about experiments that directly prove the invariance of light speed to observers, distinguishing this from experiments showing invariance to source motion.
  • Others argue that the motion of the source and observer is equivalent due to the principle of relativity, suggesting that any experiment demonstrating invariance to source motion also applies to observer motion.
  • A participant points out the Doppler effect as a relevant consideration, noting that it depends on relative velocity, but others challenge its applicability to the discussion of light speed invariance.
  • Some participants assert that the principle of relativity has been experimentally validated, implying that it supports the equivalence of source and observer motion.
  • There are repeated calls for specific experimental evidence that distinguishes between the invariance of light speed to source versus observer motion, with some expressing skepticism about the existing evidence.
  • One participant references the Michelson-Morley experiment as a historical example of testing light speed invariance, while others question whether such experiments adequately address the observer's motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether there are specific experiments proving the invariance of light speed to observers. The discussion reflects multiple competing views regarding the interpretation of existing experiments and the implications of the principle of relativity.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and interpretations of experiments related to light speed invariance, particularly concerning the roles of source and observer motion. There is also a noted lack of clarity on whether existing evidence sufficiently addresses the specific question of observer motion.

Physics news on Phys.org
  • #33
georgechen said:
I meant the explanation of how GPS proves the invariance of light speed to moving observer.

This is like knowing that ##2 + 3 = 5## but asking for a proof that ##3 + 2 = 5##. Nobody is going to bother to write down an explicit proof since it is already a well established fact that addition is commutative. Similarly, nobody is going to bother to write down an explicit explanation of how GPS proves that only relative motion is physically meaningful, since it is already a well established fact that the principle of relativity is true.

In other words, your question has been answered. The fact that you obstinately refuse to accept the answer does not mean the answer is invalid. It's valid.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, vanhees71, berkeman and 2 others
  • #34
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, PeroK, russ_watters and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K