Light's Ability to Move Matter: Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter tdev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
AI Thread Summary
Light can indeed move matter through radiation pressure, as it possesses momentum despite having no mass. In relativity, momentum is defined by the equation E² = (pc)² + (mc²)², leading to the conclusion that photons, which have zero mass, still carry momentum defined by E = pc. The de Broglie relationship further explains that a photon's momentum is p = h/λ, linking its momentum to its wavelength. Classical electrodynamics also supports this, showing that electromagnetic waves carry energy and momentum, consistent with E = pc. The interaction of light with surfaces, such as a beam reflecting off a surface, results in a force proportional to the change in momentum of the photons involved.
tdev
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
can light move matter?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Light possesses momentum, so in that sense it can certainly move matter in the form of radiation pressure. Was there anything in particular you were looking for?
 
But it doesn't have any mass to posses momentum,then how can it iteract with matter?
 
In non-relativistic mechanics, we learn that momentum is given by ##p = mv##, but in relativity it comes out that the relationship is actually $$E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2$$ where ##c## is the speed of light and ##E## is the energy. For a photon, ##m = 0##, which gives us $$E = pc$$ And we know that photons have energy, so they must necessarily have momentum.

Additionally, as you would learn in introductory quantum mechanics, the de Broglie relationships state that the momentum of a photon is given by $$p = \frac{h}{\lambda}$$ where ##\lambda## is the photon's wavelength and ##h## is called the Plank constant. (This relationship actually turns out to be true for all particles, but that's another story.)

Note that I'm simply stating facts here, I haven't actually explained anything properly. There's a lot of physics that really contextualizes these relationships, but the basic point is that the notion of momentum just being the product of mass and velocity isn't really satisfactory.
 
Last edited:
Also, even in classical electrodynamics, in which concept of "photon" does not appear at all, electromagnetic waves carry energy and momentum which are related by (surprise!) E = pc.
 
jtbell said:
Also, even in classical electrodynamics, in which concept of "photon" does not appear at all, electromagnetic waves carry energy and momentum which are related by (surprise!) E = pc.

Yes. If you do all the classical EM calculations for what happens when a beam of light falls on a reflecting surface, there is a resulting force on that surface which corresponds exactly to the rate of change of momentum of the equivalent rate of photons bouncing off it. Things like that are really refreshing, imo.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top