Limit at which Strong Nuclear force = Electromagnetism

daviddanut
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Is there a defined distance at which Electromagnetism starts exerting more force than the strong nuclear force?

So far I have

Gluons have <20MeV (32.04×10-13J) of energy.
Using the uncertainty principle:

t=h/(4×pi×E) and distance = t×c

Therefore t = (6.6×10^-34)/(4×pi×<32.04×10^-13) =<1.639×10^-23s
Therefore d = <1.639×10^-23 × 3.0×10^8 = <4.9×10^-15m

So the strong nuclear force has a maximum range of 4.9×10^-15m

The electromagnetic force has an infinite range, but it's force is proportional to the inverse square of the radius, so it drops exponentially.
F=(q1*q2)/(4×pi×ε0×r^2)

Where q1 + q2 are the charges of repelling particles, in this case 2 hydrogen nuclei and ε0 is the permittivity of a vacuum (as the space inside an atom is a vacuum)

The force at the limit of the Strong Nuclear force's range is:

F=(1.6×10^-19×1.6×10^-19)/(4×pi×8.85×10^-12×(4.9×10^-15)^2)) = 9.59 N

Is there anyway to link these two equations to get a definite limit? I'm attempting to explain the basics of fusing 2 hydrogen nuclei.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The gluon mass you used is an exptl upper limit. The gluon is expected to be massless like the photon. There are two types of "nuclear force" to consider. One is the force between quarks inside hadrons. The other is the effective force between baryons, which has a range of about 1 fm and is about 10 times stronger than the EM force. I think this is the force you should compare to the EM force. The equation you want is exp(-r/R)=e^2/g^2, where
R~1fm and e^2/g^2~0.1
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top