Proving Non-Existence of First Moment in Cauchy Distribution

In summary, the Cauchy distribution is a probability distribution that describes the behavior of real-valued functions whose second moment does not exist.
  • #1
FNMwacki
15
0
I've evaluated the integral of my problem to be (ln(x^2 + 1)/2*pi), and need to evaluate this at infinity and negative infinity...not sure where to proceed from here to evaluate these limits.

Actually i need to prove that it doesn't exist (I am proving the first moment of the Cauchy Distribution does not exist)

Thanks for any help in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is it sufficient to state that both these limits (at positive and Neg infinity) = infinity and that (infinity - infinity) is not defined??
 
  • #3
FNMwacki said:
I've evaluated the integral of my problem to be (ln(x^2 + 1)/2*pi), and need to evaluate this at infinity and negative infinity...not sure where to proceed from here to evaluate these limits.
Since your limits of integration appear to be -infinity and +infinity, you are dealing with an improper integral, so what you have done is incorrect.

I believe your original integral looks something like this.

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x) dx[/tex]

The way to approach it is to split it into two improper integrals, like so.
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^0 f(x) dx + \int_0^{\infty} f(x) dx [/tex]

To evaluate these improper integrals, use limits, like this.
[tex]\lim_{a \to -\infty} \int_a^0 f(x) dx + \lim_{b \to \infty} \int_0^b f(x) dx [/tex]


FNMwacki said:
Actually i need to prove that it doesn't exist (I am proving the first moment of the Cauchy Distribution does not exist)

Thanks for any help in advance.
 
  • #4
Thanks for the response, I see your point, but even evaluating as such I would get (∞ -0) + (0 - ∞) = (∞ - ∞) which is still undefined...
 
  • #5
PS - Thanks for the "Helpful symbols" ;)
 
  • #6
If the first limit is infinite, then the first integral diverges. Same for the second integral.
 
  • #7
Thanks again for the response, but I'm not sure I follow the point you are trying to make here...

If the integrals diverge, and knowing Cauchy Distribution is symmetric, we can use the reflection property and also say it is 2*(infinity - 0)...
 
  • #8
Based on your result in the first post, it seems to me that your integral was roughly this:
[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{2x}{x^2 + 1} dx[/tex]

I have omitted the constants, so some adjustment would be necessary to get exactly what you got for the antiderivative, which was (1/2pi) * ln(x2 + 1).

The problem is that the integrand above is NOT an even function, so the two halves of the graph aren't symmetric about the y-axis. This makes me think you have made a mistake in your integration.

Per Wikepedia, the standard Cauchy distribution has a pdf of f(x; 0, 1) = 1/(pi * (1 + x2)). The antiderivative here is not a log.
 
  • #9
You are correct, f(x; 0, 1) = 1/(pi * (1 + x^2)) is my PDF, but i am trying to prove the Expectation of this pdf, so ∫ x*f(x)dx from -∞ to ∞

I pull out the 1/pi, use U substitution for (1+x^2), so i have (1/pi)*∫ x/(2xu) du, where du=2xdx => dx=du/2x

then i call pull out the 2 from the denominator to have (1/2*pi)*∫ 1/(u) du >>the x's cancel

the integral of 1/u = log(u); substitute back in for u to get (log(x^2 + 1)/(2*pi))

or am i missing something here??
 
  • #10
FNMwacki said:
Thanks again for the response, but I'm not sure I follow the point you are trying to make here...

If the integrals diverge, and knowing Cauchy Distribution is symmetric, we can use the reflection property and also say it is 2*(infinity - 0)...

Your distribution is symmetric (it's an even function), but your integrand is not symmetric, at least not in the same way. The integrand is an odd function, meaning that the graph is symmetric across the origin.

FNMwacki said:
You are correct, f(x; 0, 1) = 1/(pi * (1 + x^2)) is my PDF, but i am trying to prove the Expectation of this pdf, so ∫ x*f(x)dx from -∞ to ∞

I pull out the 1/pi, use U substitution for (1+x^2), so i have (1/pi)*∫ x/(2xu) du, where du=2xdx => dx=du/2x

then i call pull out the 2 from the denominator to have (1/2*pi)*∫ 1/(u) du >>the x's cancel

the integral of 1/u = log(u); substitute back in for u to get (log(x^2 + 1)/(2*pi))

or am i missing something here??
I didn't put it together that you were trying to find E(X), so the work above looks fine. I think it would be sufficient to say that each of the two integrals diverges. (One diverges to infinity and the other to neg. infinity.)
 
  • #11
Ok, thanks again for the help. Looking back now I probably could have been more clear what I was doing in the original post...
 
  • #12
On the other hand, you might look at this as:

[tex]\lim_{a\to\infty}\int_{-a}^{a} \frac{2x}{x^2 + 1}\, dx \,,[/tex]

which would give you zero.
 
  • #13
SammyS said:
On the other hand, you might look at this as:

[tex]\lim_{a\to\infty}\int_{-a}^{a} \frac{2x}{x^2 + 1}\, dx \,,[/tex]

which would give you zero.

For the reason this won't work, see this wiki article - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_distribution - especially the section titled Mean.
 
  • #14
SammyS said:
On the other hand, you might look at this as:

[tex]\lim_{a\to\infty}\int_{-a}^{a} \frac{2x}{x^2 + 1}\, dx \,,[/tex]

which would give you zero.

Ya, thanks for the input, but i already know the expectation should not exist...

Or you could see Wiki as Mark pointed out...
 

1. What is a limit integral?

A limit integral is a mathematical concept used in calculus to determine the area under a curve. It involves taking the limit of a sum of rectangles as the width of the rectangles approaches zero. This allows for the accurate calculation of the area under curves that are not easily defined by other methods.

2. How is a limit integral evaluated?

A limit integral is evaluated using the fundamental theorem of calculus, which states that the integral of a function can be calculated by finding its antiderivative and evaluating it at the upper and lower limits of integration. It involves taking the limit of a sum of rectangles as the width of the rectangles approaches zero.

3. What is the difference between a definite and indefinite limit integral?

A definite limit integral has specific limits of integration, while an indefinite limit integral does not. This means that a definite limit integral will result in a specific numerical value, while an indefinite limit integral will result in a function that can still be evaluated at different points.

4. What types of functions can be evaluated using a limit integral?

Limit integrals can be used to evaluate the area under any continuous curve, including polynomial functions, trigonometric functions, and exponential functions. They can also be used to evaluate the area between two curves.

5. Why is the limit integral important in science?

The limit integral is important in science because it allows for the accurate calculation of areas and volumes that are not easily defined by other methods. This makes it a useful tool in many fields of science, including physics, chemistry, and engineering. It also allows for the calculation of important quantities such as work, energy, and probability in real-world applications.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
917
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
900
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
999
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top