Limit of a Greatest Integer Function using Squeeze help

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the limit of a greatest integer function using the squeeze theorem. The original poster seeks assistance in setting up the appropriate inequalities for the limit as x approaches positive infinity for the expression (x^2 - [[x^2]])/x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of the greatest integer function and its implications for the limit. There are attempts to establish inequalities involving the greatest integer function and to apply the squeeze theorem. Questions arise regarding the validity of certain inequalities and whether the squeeze theorem can be applied with strict inequalities.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring various approaches to set up the squeeze theorem correctly. Some have provided guidance on how to manipulate the inequalities, while others are questioning the assumptions and definitions involved in the setup.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring the inequalities are correctly established, particularly for values of x greater than 1. Participants are also considering the implications of using strict versus non-strict inequalities in the context of the squeeze theorem.

Kindayr
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
my midterm is in 4 hours and this actually the only thing i need help with.

Homework Statement


prove using squeeze theorem that lim(x-> +inf) (x^2 - [[x^2]])/x = 0


Homework Equations


g(x)<=f(x)<=h(x) [squeeze theorem]


The Attempt at a Solution


on the assignment i didn't know we had to use squeeze, so i just plugged in +inf and got 0, but we had to use squeeze. i wasn't there for his explanation of it.

all i need help with is setting up the inequality for the squeeze theorem and I'm fine, I'm just drawing blanks for all of this. help would be sooooo amazing. again, this is the only thing I'm confused on for my midterm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what do the double brackets mean?
 
the greatest integer function/the floor function.

so if its 5.5, the [[]] make it 5, if its -6.3 the [[]] make it -7
 
i've been trying, and the only result i can get, and i don't know if its true is:

x-1 < [[x]] <= x

(x^2 - (x^2 - 1))/x < (x^2 - [[x^2]])/x <= (x^2 - (x^2))/x

-1/x < f(x) <= 0/x

-1/x < f(x) <= 0

(lim x-->+inf) -1/x = 0
(lim x-->+inf) 0 = 0

.:. through squeeze theorem, (lim x-->+inf) f(x) = 0

but does that squeeze theorem work if the inequality on the left is just < and not <=?
 
close, few mistakes though
first f is always positive, consider the squeeze limts you get, they don't really make sense

Kindayr said:
i've been trying, and the only result i can get, and i don't know if its true is:

x-1 < [[x]] <= x

(x^2 - (x^2 - 1))/x < (x^2 - [[x^2]])/x <= (x^2 - (x^2))/x
few changes here, first start with the assumption x>1 to reduce confusion later
the first line is correct
x-1< [[x]] <= x

now square everything
(x-1)2< [[x]]2 <= x2

multiply by -1, reversing the order
-x2<= -[[x]]2 < -(x-1)2

add x2 and divide by x gives

0=(x2 - x2)/x<= (x2-[[x]]2)/x < (x2-(x-1)2)/x

Kindayr said:
-1/x < f(x) <= 0/x

-1/x < f(x) <= 0

(lim x-->+inf) -1/x = 0
(lim x-->+inf) 0 = 0

.:. through squeeze theorem, (lim x-->+inf) f(x) = 0

but does that squeeze theorem work if the inequality on the left is just < and not <=?

no its fine (if you use the correct squeeze as above), its still squeezed between 2 functions that go to the same limit
 
Last edited:
if you do it your way though:

x-1 < [[x]] <= x

(x-1)2 < [[x]]2 <= x2

first of all, does [[x2]] = [[x]]2?

then we goto:

-x2 <= -[[x]]2 < -(x-1)2

0/x <= f(x) < (x2 - x2 + 2x + 1)/x

don't we?

then you'd have 0 <= f(x) < 2
 
should i start off with:
for x>1
x^2 - 1 < [[x^2]] < x^2

and move from there?
 
yeah that looks good, i misplaced the bracket,

so for x>1
x - 1 < [[x]] <= x
giving
x2 - 1 < [[x2]] <= x2
minus
- x2 < -[[x2]] <= -x2+ 1
then +x2
0 = x2- x2 <x2 -[[x2]] <= x2-x2+ 1 = 1
then /x

0/x< (x2 -[[x2]])x <= 1/x as required
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
6K