Limit problem with b^m*e^-(sb)

  • Thread starter Thread starter fleuryf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the expression b^m/(e^(sb)) as b approaches infinity is conclusively shown to be 0 for any natural number m. This is established using L'Hôpital's Rule, which is applicable due to the indeterminate form ∞/∞. By differentiating the numerator and denominator m times, the limit simplifies to a form where the exponential function in the denominator dominates, leading to the conclusion that the limit approaches 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with L'Hôpital's Rule
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their growth rates
  • Basic differentiation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of L'Hôpital's Rule in various limit problems
  • Explore the growth rates of polynomial versus exponential functions
  • Learn about the concept of indeterminate forms in calculus
  • Practice solving limits involving higher-order derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on limits and L'Hôpital's Rule, as well as educators looking for examples of limit evaluation techniques.

fleuryf
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



show for m element of Natural numbers lim b->oo b^m/(e^(sb)) = 0



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Here is what I've started with so far but have ended up at a dead end. I just would like some help to point me in the right direction if possible. Thank you in advance


as b->oo b^m/(e^(sb)) yields the indeterminate form oo/oo.

both b^m and e^(sb) are differentiable near the limit

the derivative of the denominator is non zero so l'hospital's rule is applicable

However, when I apply lhopital's rule I get

lim b->oo mb^(m-1)/(se^(sb))

My approach was to prove this inductively, ie for m=1 and go from there but I can't even show this is true for m=1. Maybe this is completely the wrong approach. I have convinced myself that I am heading in the wrong direction.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think you're heading in the right dierection

after using L'hop's rule & differntiating you have a similar limit except with now ith b^m-1, ie. one lower power of b on numerator

what happens when you have reapeat L'hop's rule m times?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K