Limit question series representation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit as \( t \) approaches \( 0^+ \) for the expression \( \frac{\exp(-x^2/t)}{\sqrt{t}} \). Participants explore various mathematical techniques, including series representation and L'Hôpital's rule, to analyze the behavior of the limit.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using series representation and question the origin of certain terms in the series. There are suggestions to apply substitutions and L'Hôpital's rule, with some participants expressing confusion about the effectiveness of these methods. The role of logarithmic transformations in simplifying the limit is also considered.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with multiple participants offering different perspectives on the limit evaluation. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of logarithms and L'Hôpital's rule, but there is no clear consensus on the best approach or the correctness of the reasoning presented.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of L'Hôpital's rule and the interpretation of limits involving logarithmic expressions. Participants are also navigating the implications of their mathematical manipulations without arriving at a definitive conclusion.

Gekko
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Lim (t->0+) [exp(-x^2/t)] / sqrt(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



Ive looked at series representation:

1/sqrt(t) * [exp(-x^2) - 1+t^2/2 + t^3/6 + ...] but that doesn't help.
L'Hopital's rule isn't any use either because the t terms are in the denominator but I know this tends to 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try making the substitution:
[tex]t \rightarrow \frac{1}{u}[/tex]
and taking the limit [tex]u \rightarrow \infty[/tex].

Retry L'Hopital's rule.
 
Gekko said:

Homework Statement



Lim (t->0+) [exp(-x^2/t)] / sqrt(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



Ive looked at series representation:

1/sqrt(t) * [exp(-x^2) - 1+t^2/2 + t^3/6 + ...] but that doesn't help.
Where does the - 1+t^2/2 + t^3/6 + ... part come from?
Gekko said:
L'Hopital's rule isn't any use either because the t terms are in the denominator but I know this tends to 0
 
hi Mark44, the series comes from splitting out into exp(-x^2) and exp(t) and then using the series representation of the exponential function on the second term.

The substitution approach works. Thanks Coto
 
But you seem to be saying that e^(a/b) = e^a - e^b. That's not true.
 
Sorry you're right. That a mistake
 
Coto, actual I don't see how that sub helps because I now have:

(u^3/2)(x^2/2)exp(-ux^2/4) as u tends to inf

The exponential term tends to zero however the u^3/2 tends to infinity
 
Go back to exp(-x^2/t)*t^(-1/2). Take the log. Now try to figure out what the limit of the log might be. l'Hopital will help with some steps on the way.
 
Last edited:
So if we perform l'hopital first and then log we obtain

Ln(L)=ln(-x^2)-ln(2t^0.5)+x^2/4t

The limit of -ln(2t^0.5) is -inf and the limit of x^2/4t is also inf as t -> 0 and exp(inf) = inf which means the limit is indeterminate
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Is l'hospital's rule the problem in this situation?
 
  • #11
Gekko said:
Is l'hospital's rule the problem in this situation?

I would do log first. If you get something like (1/t)-log(t) write it as (1-t*log(t))/t and think about that. l'Hopital might help with thinking about the t*log(t) part.
 
  • #12
Dick said:
I would do log first. If you get something like (1/t)-log(t) write it as (1-t*log(t))/t and think about that. l'Hopital might help with thinking about the t*log(t) part.

ln(L) = (-x^2-4tln(sqrt(t))) / 4t

L'Hopital's: f'(t)/g'(t) where f(t) = -[x^2+4tln(sqrt(t))] and g(t)=4t

f'(t) = -[4ln(sqrt(t)) + 4t/2x], g'(t) = 4

f'(t)/g'(t) = -[ln(sqrt(t)) + t/2x] = inf. L = e^inf = inf which is not the correct answer

Where is this approach going wrong?
 
  • #13
Gekko said:
ln(L) = (-x^2-4tln(sqrt(t))) / 4t

L'Hopital's: f'(t)/g'(t) where f(t) = -[x^2+4tln(sqrt(t))] and g(t)=4t

f'(t) = -[4ln(sqrt(t)) + 4t/2x], g'(t) = 4

f'(t)/g'(t) = -[ln(sqrt(t)) + t/2x] = inf. L = e^inf = inf which is not the correct answer

Where is this approach going wrong?

Think about the t*log(sqrt(t)) part separately before you apply l'Hopital to the whole thing. It may NOT even be indeterminant. Write it as log(sqrt(t))/(1/t). Apply l'Hopital to just that. It wouldn't hurt to notice log(sqrt(t))=(1/2)*log(t) either.
 
  • #14
Dick said:
Think about the t*log(sqrt(t)) part separately before you apply l'Hopital to the whole thing. It may NOT even be indeterminant. Write it as log(sqrt(t))/(1/t). Apply l'Hopital to just that. It wouldn't hurt to notice log(sqrt(t))=(1/2)*log(t) either.

So, just to follow up: log(L) = -[(x^2-4tlog(sqrt(t)))/4t]

applying l'hopital to 4tlog(sqrt(t)) or 2tlog(t) where f(t) = 2log(t) and g(t)=1/t gives

-2t^2/t = -2t

Substituting, our limit becomes log(L) = (-x^2 + 2t)/4t = -x^2/4t + 1/2 = -inf
exp(-inf) = 0.

Thank you!
 
  • #15
Gekko said:
So, just to follow up: log(L) = -[(x^2-4tlog(sqrt(t)))/4t]

applying l'hopital to 4tlog(sqrt(t)) or 2tlog(t) where f(t) = 2log(t) and g(t)=1/t gives

-2t^2/t = -2t

Substituting, our limit becomes log(L) = (-x^2 + 2t)/4t = -x^2/4t + 1/2 = -inf
exp(-inf) = 0.

Thank you!

It might be a little dangerous to be saying things like lim 4tlog(sqrt(t))=(-2t). The limit is a number. Not an expression. I would say the limit is zero and leave it at that.
 
  • #16
Dick said:
It might be a little dangerous to be saying things like lim 4tlog(sqrt(t))=(-2t). The limit is a number. Not an expression. I would say the limit is zero and leave it at that.

Ah yes I see your point. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K