LIMITS, complicated square roots and factoring

susan__t
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
The question is as follows:
\frac{lim}{h\rightarrow0} \frac{\sqrt{1+h}-1}{h}

I don't know if the way I approached the question is right, I'll give you a step by step of what I attempted:
First I converted the square root into 11/2 and h1/2 (can I do that? Is that correct?)
Then I continued to evaluate, getting h1/2 over h
Finally I determined the value to be 0 because 0-1/2 is 0.

I feel as though my first step is where I might have errored but I'm not sure how else to approach it, perhaps by converting the h to a h-1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
susan__t said:
First I converted the square root into 11/2 and h1/2 (can I do that? Is that correct?)
Are you saying that \sqrt{1 + h} = \sqrt{1} + \sqrt{h} (for all h)? If so, then no, this is not correct.

but I'm not sure how else to approach it
Hint: Multiply top and bottom by \sqrt{1+h} + 1, and see what happens.
 
Hi again Susan_t;

When you do the multiplication suggested above, think about how the product (a-b)(a+b) is expanded.

I don't like the word "trick" in relation to mathematics, but the suggested step given by morphism will be a handy one to master in your studies.
 
Yes! that definitely got my wheels turning, I ended up rationalizing it by the multiplying of both the top and the bottom of the equation with the opposite of the numerator and an answer of one half. Thanks for the help again
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top