Limits with two variables, explain why limit DNE

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit of a function of two variables as it approaches the point (0,0). The function in question is f(x,y) = (x^4y)/(x^8+y^4). Participants explore the behavior of the limit along different paths, specifically y=x and y=x^4, and question the conditions under which a limit exists.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to evaluate the limit by substituting specific paths into the function and simplifying the expressions. Questions arise regarding the nature of limits in multi-variable contexts, particularly about the undefined nature of the function at (0,0) and the implications of approaching from different directions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have noted that the limit does not exist due to differing values approached along different paths. There is ongoing exploration of how to properly evaluate the limits and the significance of approaching the point (0,0) from various directions. Guidance has been offered regarding the simplification of expressions and the evaluation of limits.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the function is undefined at the point (0,0), which is a critical aspect of the discussion. The need to evaluate limits along specified paths to determine the existence of the limit is also emphasized.

lonewolf219
Messages
186
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


(Sorry, having problems with math symbols)

lim f(x,y) [(x^4)y]/(x^8+y^4)
(x,y)→(0,0)

Homework Equations



Compare limits when

a.) y=x
b.) y=x^4

The Attempt at a Solution



The solutions are

a.) limit approaches 0
b.) limit approaches 1

I think I understand in order for a limit to exist, it must approach the same value regardless of which direction we approach it from. So I think that the limit DNE here because there are two different values approached. However, not really sure how to substitute values into the equation without getting zero for both a and b.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct about the limit not existing.

To evaluate the limits, you are given formulas for what y is in terms of x. You can simply plug these equations in and eliminate a variable and solve the limit. Since Both equations approach the same point, the variable that is still left approaches 0. You are effectively making a 2-d problem into a 1-d problem.

So, if [itex]y=x[/itex], [itex]\displaystyle\lim_{(x,y) \rightarrow (0,0)} \displaystyle\frac{x^{4}y}{x^{8}+y^{4}} = \displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \displaystyle\frac{x^{5}}{x^8+x^4}[/itex]. What do you get when you solve this limit?

Similarly, for [itex]y=x^{4}[/itex], [itex]\displaystyle\lim_{(x,y) \rightarrow (0,0)} \displaystyle\frac{x^{4}y}{x^{8}+y^{4}} = \displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \displaystyle\frac{x^{8}}{x^{8}+(x^{4})^{4}}[/itex]. What is the limit of this?
 
(I am assuming we are evaluating the function at the point (0,0), if this is correct terminology?)

When y=x, the x^8 is evaluated at 0, but what happens to the remaining fraction x^5/x^4. Is that simply "x", which is then evaluated again at 0?

When y=x^4, the x^8 in the denominator again becomes 0, and a fraction remains that is x^8/x^8 which is 1? Thanks for your reply scurty

But perhaps this is not simply evaluating a function at point (a)...
 
(I am assuming we are evaluating the function at the point (0,0), if this is correct terminology?)

Yes, that's exactly what you are doing. However, you are approaching the point (0,0) from two different directions in parts a) and b). Because the limit values are not the same when approached from ALL directions, the limit does not exist.

Think of this problem when only considering one variable (i.e. the real plane). Say you want to evaluate [itex]\displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{x}[/itex]. To solve this you need to make sure [itex]\displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 0^{-}} \frac{1}{x} = \displaystyle\lim_{x \rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{1}{x}[/itex]. Only then does the limit value exist! (in this case the limit does not exist)

This is no different except we are considering two variables. To make the calculation easier we substitute for variables to reduce it to one.

When y=x, the x^8 is evaluated at 0, but what happens to the remaining fraction x^5/x^4. Is that simply "x", which is then evaluated again at 0?

Not quite. Try factoring out the greatest common factor out of the denominator and see what you are left with!

When y=x^4, the x^8 in the denominator again becomes 0, and a fraction remains that is x^8/x^8 which is 1? Thanks for your reply scurty

Try the same method I suggested above. We are taking the limit as x approaches 0, not as [itex]x^{4}[/itex] approaches 0.

Does that make more sense hopefully?
 
Thanks for mentioning we are reducing the problem from two dimensions to one dimension.. and for providing that example. Jarring my memory of calc 1 and now I see "of course that's what we were doing back then!"

Let's see how I did...

y=x

(x^4/x^4)[x/(x^4+1)]→(x=0)→(0/0+1) = 0

y=x^4

(x^8/x^8)[1/(1+x^8)] →(x=0)→(1/1+0) = 10≠1
limit DNE
 
Exactly! Nice work! Sometimes the tricky problems are coming up with two different equations to approach the point at to show the limit doesn't exist by yourself. In this problem they gave you the two so it wasn't so bad.
 
Thanks Scurty! This forum is awesome!
 
lonewolf219 said:
(I am assuming we are evaluating the function at the point (0,0), if this is correct terminology?)

When y=x, the x^8 is evaluated at 0, but what happens to the remaining fraction x^5/x^4. Is that simply "x", which is then evaluated again at 0?

When y=x^4, the x^8 in the denominator again becomes 0, and a fraction remains that is x^8/x^8 which is 1? Thanks for your reply scurty

But perhaps this is not simply evaluating a function at point (a)...

I'm assuming that what you mean by "the function," you mean ## \frac{x^4y}{x^8 + y^4}##.

If so, you cannot evaluate this function at the point (0, 0), because this function is undefined there. That's the reason that you are asked to evaluate the limit as (x, y) → (0, 0).

Along each the specified paths, the function simplifies to a different function that involves only x, and you can take the limit as x → 0.

Note that for both limits, you cannot simply evaluate the limit expression at x = 0, as both limit expressions are undefined at x = 0. Using the properties of limits, however, you can evaluate both limits.

As you have found, on each of these paths a limit exists, but it is not the same limit for both paths.

scurty said:
Yes, that's exactly what you are doing.
No it isn't. The function in the original limit is undefined at the point (0, 0). In addition, along each of the two paths, the simplfied limit expression was undefined at x = 0.
 
Mark44 said:
No it isn't. The function in the original limit is undefined at the point (0, 0). In addition, along each of the two paths, the simplfied limit expression was undefined at x = 0.

Sorry, I misread his text. I read it as evaluating the limit of the function at the point (0,0), he left out the limit part though.
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K