Line integral question, answer is here, just confused on it

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a line integral involving parameterization with respect to a variable \( t \). The original poster expresses confusion regarding the appearance of certain terms in the integral after substitution, specifically questioning the origin of \( 2t \) and the use of \( \sqrt{t} \) instead of \( \sqrt{t^2} \).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the substitution process in the line integral and questions the notation used for the differential. Some participants suggest that the confusion may stem from typographical errors in the expressions presented.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the notation and reasoning behind the terms in the integral. There is acknowledgment of potential typos, but no consensus has been reached regarding the correct interpretation of the expressions.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the parameterization of the integral and the corresponding substitutions, with some participants noting discrepancies in the expressions used. The discussion reflects an exploration of the mathematical reasoning behind the setup of the integral.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone I'm confused on this line integral.
The substiution is easy but I'm not sure where 2t is coming from...

integral over C x^2*y*sqrt(z) dz;
C: x = t^3;
y = t;
z = t^2;

0 <= t <= 1

integral over C x^2*y*sqrt(z) dz =
integral 0 to 1 (t^3)^2 (t) sqrt(t) * 2t dt =
integral 0 to 1 2*t^9 dt;

Okay I see they are just plugging in the t's for the x,y,z, but why do they write sqrt(t)? the sqrt(t^2) is just t.

Also where is this 2t dt coming from?

I thought maybe they used: sqrt(t^2); u = t^2;
du = 2t dt;
1/2*du = t dt;


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess sqrt(t) is just a typo. It should be sqrt(t^2) (Note that the final integral is t^9). And that 2tdt is equal to the differential dz.
 
What Neutrino said. The final integrand should be 2t^9. In fact, if you compare step 2 to step 3, you'll find that it does not logically follow. So in all likelihood it was a typo.
 
THanks for the help guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K