Linear 1st order PDE (boundary conditions)

twizzy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve the equation u_{x}+2xy^{2}u_{y}=0 with u(x,0)=\phi(x)

Homework Equations


Implicit function theorem
\frac{dy}{dx}=-\frac{\partial u/\partial x}{\partial u/\partial y}

The Attempt at a Solution


-\frac{u_x}{u_y}=\frac{dy}{dx}=2xy^2
Separating variables
\frac{dy}{y^2}=2xdx
\frac{-1}{y}=x^2+c
C=x^2+\frac{1}{y}
So u(x,y)=f(x^2+\frac{1}{y})
The boundary condition is given as evaluating at y=0 which doesn't seem to make sense. Any thoughts? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Wouldn't be boundary condition mean you need to pick an f such that f(u)->0 as u->infinity?
 
Dick said:
Wouldn't be boundary condition mean you need to pick an f such that f(u)->0 as u->infinity?

Since u(x,y)=f(x^2+\frac{1}{y}) and u(x,0)=\phi(x),
we have u(x,0)=f(x^2+\frac{1}{\epsilon})=\phi(x) where \epsilon\rightarrow 0. This would imply that \lim_{u\rightarrow \infty}f(u)=\phi(x). Then again, that can't be right because the limit as u\rightarrow \infty should not depend on x. I'm not sure if I see why you have "f(u)->0".
 
twizzy said:
Since u(x,y)=f(x^2+\frac{1}{y}) and u(x,0)=\phi(x),
we have u(x,0)=f(x^2+\frac{1}{\epsilon})=\phi(x) where \epsilon\rightarrow 0. This would imply that \lim_{u\rightarrow \infty}f(u)=\phi(x). Then again, that can't be right because the limit as u\rightarrow \infty should not depend on x. I'm not sure if I see why you have "f(u)->0".

I have "f(u)->0" because I was reading the boundary condition as u(x,0)=0, not phi(x). My mistake.
 
So then if \phi(x) were not a constant, would the question even make sense?
 
twizzy said:
So then if \phi(x) were not a constant, would the question even make sense?

I'm having trouble seeing how. But then maybe I'm missing something...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top