MHB Linear Algebra: Analyzing A Linear Transformation

Zoey93
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I need help with part D2. My explanation is not right so I honestly do not know what I am suppose to write. My assignment is attached to this thread.

View attachment 5428

View attachment 5423
 

Attachments

  • Task 1 Linear Algebra page 3.pdf
    Task 1 Linear Algebra page 3.pdf
    220.2 KB · Views: 94
  • zoey93.png
    zoey93.png
    26.9 KB · Views: 100
Physics news on Phys.org
The columns of $D$ can be determined by using any two of the other vertices of the parallelogram.
It would be wrong to choose $(8,6)$ as a column, so not all of the remaining three vertices can serve as columns. Let $O$ be the origin, $A(1,0)$, $B(1,1)$ and $C(0,1)$. Let also $A'(2,2)$, $B'(8,6)$ and $C'(6,4)$. Then $D$ should map $\overrightarrow{OA}$ to $\overrightarrow{OA'}$ and $\overrightarrow{OC}$ to $\overrightarrow{OC'}$. Then $\overrightarrow{OB}=\overrightarrow{OA}+\overrightarrow{OC}$ will automatically be mapped to $\overrightarrow{OA'}+\overrightarrow{OC'}=\overrightarrow{OB'}$. Alternatively, $\overrightarrow{OA}$ can be mapped to $\overrightarrow{OC'}$ and $\overrightarrow{OC}$ to $\overrightarrow{OA'}$; the location of $B'$ will be the same. In the first scenario
\[
D\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}2\\2\end{pmatrix},
\]
so the first column of $D$ is $(2,2)$. Also
\[
D\begin{pmatrix}0\\1\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}6\\4\end{pmatrix},
\]
so the second column of $D$ is $(6,4)$. In the second scenario the columns are swapped.

But if, say, $D=\begin{pmatrix}2&8\\2&6\end{pmatrix}$, then $D$ maps $\overrightarrow{OA}$ to $\overrightarrow{OA'}$ and $\overrightarrow{OC}$ to $\overrightarrow{OB'}$. In this case, $\overrightarrow{OB}=\overrightarrow{OA}+\overrightarrow{OC}$ will be mapped to $\overrightarrow{OA'}+\overrightarrow{OB'}$, and the coordinates of the resulting vector, i.e., the coordinates of the image of $B$, are $(10,8)$, which is incorrect.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K