Linear Algebra - Orthogonal Projections

Click For Summary
To prove that P is an orthogonal projection, it is established that P satisfies P² = P and that every vector in Ker(P) is orthogonal to every vector in Im(P). The discussion highlights the proof of property 3, showing that v - P(v) is in Uperp by using the decomposition of v into components in U and Uperp. Property 1 is confirmed by demonstrating that Im(P) equals U, while the challenge remains in proving property 2, which relates Ker(P) to Uperp. The conversation also touches on property 5, suggesting the use of the triangle inequality to establish the required norm comparison. The overall conclusion is that the properties of orthogonal projections can be verified through these relationships.
steelphantom
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that if P in L(V) is such that P2 = P and every vector in Ker(P) is orthogonal to every vector in Im(P), then P is an orthogonal Projection.


Homework Equations


Orthogonal projections have the following properties:

1) Im(P) = U
2) Ker(P) = Uperp
3) v - P(v) is in Uperp for every v in V.
4) P2 = P
5) ||P(v)|| <= ||v|| for every v in V.

The Attempt at a Solution


Property 4) is given, so that's done. I proved property 3) by using the equation v = P(u) + w, where w is in Uperp. Rearranging, I get v - P(u) = w, which is in Uperp.

Property 1) was proven in class: Clearly Im(P) is a subset of U. But for every u in U, P(u) = u since u = u + 0. Hence every element of U is in the image, and so Im(P) = U.

To prove property 2), I'm not really sure how to do this. My prof said it's basically the same thing as property 1, but I'm not really seeing it.

For property 5), I know that P(v) = <v, e_1>e_1 + ... + <v, e_m>e_m, where (e_1, ... e_m) is an orthonormal basis of U. I know that ||v|| = sqrt(<v, v>). Not sure how to compare these to come up with the inequality.

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can anyone help on proving 2) and 5)? Does 2) directly follow from 1) since every vector in Ker(P) is orthogonal to every vector in Im(P)? Thanks.
 
I don't see how you can 'prove' 1) unless you define what U is. I thought U was just another name for Im(P). If so then the premises only tell you that Ker(P) is a subset of Uperp. To prove they are equal use dim(Im(P))+dim(Ker(P))=dim(V), as it is for any linear transformation. Now all you need to do is show that the intersection of Im(P) and Ker(P) is {0}. Then you have that V=Im(P)+Ker(P) as a direct sum, so you can decompose any element of v into an image part and a kernel part. Then for 5) think about the triangle inequality.
 
U is just any subspace of V. V = U \oplus Uperp. Thanks for your help.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K