Linear algebra problem involving image spaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the image of matrix A, denoted as imA, is equal to the image of the product AV, where V is an invertible nxn matrix. Participants clarify that since A is an mxn matrix, it maps Rn to Rm, while V maps Rn to Rn. The proof requires demonstrating that imA is a subset of imAV and vice versa, utilizing the properties of invertible matrices to establish the equality of the two image spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations and image spaces
  • Familiarity with matrix multiplication and properties of invertible matrices
  • Knowledge of subspace definitions in linear algebra
  • Basic proof techniques in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations and their images
  • Learn about the implications of matrix invertibility on image spaces
  • Explore techniques for proving subspace relationships in linear algebra
  • Review examples of linear mappings and their effects on vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians focusing on vector spaces, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of matrix operations and image spaces.

Sandbox.WeC
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A is a mxn. V is nxn and invertible. Show that imA=imAV2. The attempt at a solution
Up until now I haven't done much in the way of proving things. In this case is it enough to show that they are each closed under addition and scalar multiplication? Would that mean that imA is in imAV and vice versa, meaning they are equal?

Thanks for any help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since A is "m by n", A maps Rn to Rm. Since V is "n by n", V maps Rn to Rn[/b] so that AV maps Rn to Rm.

Suppose w is in Im(A). Then there exist v in Rn such that Av= w. Since V is invertible, there exist u in Rn such that Vu= v. Then (AV)u= A(Vu)= A(v)= w. That is Im(AV) is a subset of Im(V). To prove that Im(AV)= Im(A), you must prove that Im(A) is a subset of Im(AV). To do that start "suppose w is in Im(AV). I will leave it to you.
 
I see where you are going with that. Does that mean that everything I did was wrong? I thought that if I proved they were subspaces of each other that would mean they are equal
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K