Linear Algebra Proof: Proving A=A(t), B=constant

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a proof in linear algebra involving vector calculus, specifically focusing on the relationship between vectors A and B, where A is a function of time and B is a constant vector. The participants are examining the differentiation of a product involving these vectors and exploring the implications of applying the product rule.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply the product rule to differentiate a vector expression. There are questions about the correctness of the differentiation steps and the presence of an extra time derivative on one side of the equation. Some participants are also exploring the implications of vector operations and the properties of the tensors involved.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the differentiation process, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the steps taken. Guidance has been offered regarding the application of the product rule and the interpretation of vector operations. Multiple interpretations of the expressions are being explored, particularly concerning the expansion of terms and the nature of scalar and vector products.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available for discussion. There is an emphasis on ensuring the mathematical operations adhere to the properties of vectors and tensors, which is a critical aspect of the problem.

cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A = A(t), B = constant

[tex]\frac{d}{dt} \left[A \cdot (\dot{A} \times B) \right] = \frac{d}{dt} \left[A \cdot (\ddot{A} \times B) \right][/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



In Einstein notation I get

[tex]LHS = \frac{d}{dt} \left [ A_i (\dot{A} \times B)_i \right] = \frac{d}{dt} \left [ \epsilon_{ilm} A_i \dot{A}_l B_m \right] = \epsilon_{ilm} B_m \frac{d}{dt} \left [A_i \dot{A}_l \right][/tex]

Is this right so far? Product rule on A and A-dot from here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have an extra d/dt on the right side of what you are trying to prove. But yes, now product rule. Then what?
 
I think I got it:

After using product rule I get

[tex]A \cdot ( \ddot{A} \times B) + \dot{A} \cdot ( \dot{A} \times B)[/tex]

Where the second term would be 0

So the second term must expand as (A . A) x ( A . B) ?
 
Dick said:
I think you have an extra d/dt on the right side of what you are trying to prove. But yes, now product rule. Then what?

Yeah the RHS time derivative shouldn't be there.
 
cscott said:
I think I got it:

After using product rule I get

[tex]A \cdot ( \ddot{A} \times B) + \dot{A} \cdot ( \dot{A} \times B)[/tex]

Where the second term would be 0

So the second term must expand as (A . A) x ( A . B) ?

Yes, but you don't expand it like that A.A and A.B are scalars. How can you cross them? In terms of vectors axb is perpendicular to a and b. In terms of your tensor expansion the product of the two A dots is symmetric, the corresponding indices of the epsilon tensor are antisymmetric. So?
 
Ah. This way just seemed quicker but I see where it makes no sense.

Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K