Linear Algebra: Subspace Proof

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The intersection of any collection of subspaces of a vector space V is indeed a subspace of V. To prove this, one must demonstrate that for any vectors u and v in the intersection, the sum u + v is also in the intersection, and for any vector u in the intersection and any scalar c from the field, the product cu is also in the intersection. The proof can be simplified by considering that if u and v belong to the intersection, they must also belong to any subspace W within that intersection, thereby ensuring that both vector addition and scalar multiplication hold true within W.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and subspaces
  • Familiarity with vector addition and scalar multiplication
  • Knowledge of the properties of intersections in set theory
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra, particularly regarding proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces and subspaces in linear algebra
  • Learn about the axioms of vector addition and scalar multiplication
  • Explore examples of subspace intersections in various vector spaces
  • Review formal proof techniques in linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on linear algebra, as well as anyone involved in theoretical aspects of vector spaces and subspace proofs.

*melinda*
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Prove that the intersection of any collection of subspaces of V is a subspace of V.

Ok, I know I need to show that:

1. For all u and v in the intersection, it must imply that u+v is in the intersection, and

2. For all u in the intersection and c in some field, cu must be in the intersection.

I can show both 1. and 2. for the trivial case where the intersection is zero, but I'm not sure what I need to do for the arbitrary case.

Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I'm not sure where you're stuck, so I'll throw out two random hints.


(a) Let W be one of the spaces in the intersection...

(b) What is the definition of "x is in the intersection"?
 
Since u and v are elements of the intersection, u and v will also be elements of any subspace W that is in the intersection. And since u and v are in W and W is a subspace, this guarantees that u+v will also be in W. This same argument would apply to scalar multiplication.

Is that the right idea?
 
Yes, that is one of the essential points of the proof.
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K