Linear Algrebra- Orthogonal Vectors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around properties of orthogonal vectors in linear algebra, specifically in Rn. The original poster seeks clarification on three statements regarding linear independence, properties of scalar multiplication of vectors, and a specific equation involving norms of vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the proof of linear independence for orthogonal vectors and the implications of the definitions of norms. There is an exploration of the validity of the statements presented, particularly regarding the scalar multiplication property and the equation involving vector norms.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the proof of linear independence and the properties of norms. There is an ongoing examination of the truth of statement (b), with differing opinions on its validity. The discussion remains open with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the assumptions underlying the statements, particularly whether they are to be taken as true or false. The original poster's request for proof indicates a focus on understanding rather than simply confirming correctness.

dondraper5
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble with these questions-

Explain/prove whether:
(a) Any set {v1,v2,...vk} of orthogonal vectors in Rn is linearly independent.
(b) If there is a vector v in Rn and scalar c in R, we have ||cv|| = c||v||
(c) for any vectors u, v in Rn, ||u+v||^2 + ||u-v||^2 = 2 ||u||^2 + 2||v||^2

I think part a is true, but can't get around a way to prove it. Need help with b and c.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
To show that vectors, \{v_1, v_2, v_3, \cdot\cdot\cdot, v_m\} are independent, you must show that if a_1v_1+ a_2v_2+ a_3v_3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_mv_m then a_1= a_2= a_3= \cdot\cdot\cdot= a_m= 0.

To show that take the dot product of a_1v_1+ a_2v_2+ a_3v_3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_mv_m with each of v_1, v_2, v_3, \cdot\cdot\cdot, v_m in turn.
 
^ thank you, makes sense now.
 
any ideas for b?
 
dondraper5 said:
any ideas for b?
Use the definitions of the \|x\| notation on both sides. If you're allowed to use that the map x\mapsto\|x\| is a norm, you can just compare the equality you've been given with the properties of a norm. I recommend you do it both ways. (They're both very easy).

For c, you should look at the terms on the left, one at at a time:
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> &amp;\|u+v\|^2=\cdots\\<br /> &amp;\|u-v\|^2=\cdots<br /> \end{align}<br /> Think about the relationship between the norm and the inner product. Once you have used that, the rest will be easy.
 
Last edited:
^ thanks a lot
 
Umm... (b) is not true...
 
Right, but he said "explain/prove whether...", so he probably wasn't assuming that they were all true.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K