Is 48x recording speed acceptable for burning a 650MB CD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saint
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Upgrading to a 48x CD-RW burner instead of a 52x model in Malaysia offers a minimal price difference of $10, with many users agreeing that the performance difference is negligible. Articles from PC Magazine and Maximum PC suggest that the writing speed between 48x and 52x is not significantly different, with 48x being sufficient for most users. A 48x burner can complete the burning of a 650MB CD in approximately 3 minutes and 15 seconds, which is considered acceptable by many. Users with older models report longer burning times, highlighting that the upgrade provides a substantial speed improvement. Overall, opting for the 48x model is seen as a cost-effective choice without sacrificing performance.
Saint
Messages
437
Reaction score
0
i decided to upgrade my cdrw,
48x vs 52x price difference is 10USD in malaysia.
from articles of pc magazine i read, the write speed is not much different.
i think 48x is enough.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I recall reading the same thing, although I don't recall where I read it. 48x will burn your CD's plenty fast...save the 10 bucks and go to lunch after you buy it
 
48x and 52x are blazing and you won't see too much of a difference. I have a 40x and can write a complete cd in about 3-4 minutes.
 
Heh, I never saw the need to above 24 or even 12... just get the cheap one. :)
 
I bought the Sony 48x24x48 cdrw burner, just 46 us dollar here.
Good!
 
To burn 650MB CD by cd-spying on the fly, it takes 3min 15sec if i set 48x recording speed, is this acceptable ?[?]
 
I read an article in Maximum PC about this same deal. You may want to search for it at http://www.maximumpc.com The actual difference is only by seconds!
 
Originally posted by Saint
To burn 650MB CD by cd-spying on the fly, it takes 3min 15sec if i set 48x recording speed, is this acceptable ?[?]

I think this is up to you...:wink:
Currently I do it in about 15 min (I use an older Teac...) so you are way ahead...
 
Back
Top