Linear momentum and velocity direction

AI Thread Summary
In discussions about conservation of linear momentum, it is essential to consider the direction of velocity since momentum is a vector quantity. The initial velocities of the blocks must be correctly represented, with one potentially being negative if they are moving in opposite directions. The correct equations for momentum conservation should reflect these directional considerations. Participants emphasized that assumptions about post-collision velocities should be avoided, allowing for variables v1 and v2 to be solved independently. Proper attention to direction is crucial for accurate momentum calculations.
metallica007
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone
When using the concept of the conservation of the linear momentum ΣPi = ΣPf to solve a problem, should I consider the the direction of the velocity? For Example, the following problem
t9870n.jpg

which one of the following equations is correct?
m1v0+m2v0=m1v1+m2v2
or
m1v0-m2v0=-m1v1+m2v2
note: both of the blocks have the same intial velocity (v0) because the surface is frictionless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum is a vector quantity, so you absolutely do have to pay attention to the direction when solving problems with conservation of momentum.
 
metallica007 said:
When using the concept of the conservation of the linear momentum ΣPi = ΣPf to solve a problem, should I consider the the direction of the velocity?
As cjl already stated, you must take direction into account.

which one of the following equations is correct?
m1v0+m2v0=m1v1+m2v2
or
m1v0-m2v0=-m1v1+m2v2
note: both of the blocks have the same intial velocity (v0) because the surface is frictionless.

Careful here. You're really using v0 as the initial speed; the initial velocities are +v0 and -v0. After the collision I would not make any assumptions about the directions; just let v1 and v2 be the velocities, which you'll solve for.
 
Thank you very much guys :)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top