Linear operator or nonlinear operator?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 5K views
Elbobo
Messages
145
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Verify whether or not the operator

[tex]L(u) = u_x + u_y + 1[/tex]
is linear.


Homework Equations


An operator L is linear if for any functions u, v and any constants c, the property

[tex]L(c_1 u + c_2 v) = c_1 L(u) + c_2 L(v)[/tex]
holds true.


The Attempt at a Solution



I feel as though this should be a linear operator, but the "+1" throws me off as I don't know what linear operator takes any function u, v into 1.

[tex]L = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial}{\partial y} + ?[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Elbobo said:

Homework Statement


Verify whether or not the operator

[tex]L(u) = u_x + u_y + 1[/tex]
is linear.


Homework Equations


An operator L is linear if for any functions u, v and any constants c, the property

[tex]L(c_1 u + c_2 v) = c_1 L(u) + c_2 L(v)[/tex]
holds true.


The Attempt at a Solution



I feel as though this should be a linear operator, but the "+1" throws me off as I don't know what linear operator takes any function u, v into 1.

Alright so, really there's two things you want to verify, but I suppose you could combine them into one condition like that if you want.

What is [itex]L(c_1 u + c_2 v) = ?[/itex]
 
[tex]L = c_1 \frac{ \partial u}{\partial x} + c_1 \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + c_2 \frac{ \partial v}{\partial x} + c_2 \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} + ?[/tex]

I'm still confused by that constant term.
 
Last edited:
Elbobo said:
[tex]L = c_1 \frac{ \partial u}{\partial x} + c_1 \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + c_2 \frac{ \partial u}{\partial x} + c_2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + ?[/tex]

I'm still confused by that constant term.

Just literally write out what the transform would give you, so :

[itex]L(c_1 u + c_2 v) = c_1u_x + c_1u_y + c_1 + c_2v_x + c_2v_y + c_2[/itex]

Can you continue from there? Get it into the form [itex]c_1 L(u) + c_2 L(v)[/itex]
 
Sorry for the typos everywhere earlier (edited now).

[tex]L(c_1 u + c_2 v) = c_1 u_x + c_1 u_y + c_1 + c_2 v_x + c_2 v_y + c_2[/tex]
[tex]= c_1 (u_x + u_y + 1) + c_2 (v_x + v_y + 1)[/tex]
[tex]= c_1 L(u) + c_2 L(v)[/tex]

So is that what you were guiding me to? If I did that correctly, it makes a lot more sense now, thank you. If not...
 
Elbobo said:
Sorry for the typos everywhere earlier (edited now).

[tex]L(c_1 u + c_2 v) = c_1 u_x + c_1 u_y + c_1 + c_2 v_x + c_2 v_y + c_2[/tex]
[tex]= c_1 (u_x + u_y + 1) + c_2 (v_x + v_y + 1)[/tex]
[tex]= c_1 L(u) + c_2 L(v)[/tex]

So is that what you were guiding me to? If I did that correctly, it makes a lot more sense now, thank you. If not...

No, no, no. [tex]L(c_1 u + c_2 v) = (c_1 u + c_2 v)_x + (c_1 u + c_2 v)_y + 1[/tex]