Linear Programming Constraints

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on minimizing a function over a complex surface using linear programming techniques. The user is attempting to solve the linear programming problem defined as min c^T ξ with constraints involving the gradient of the surface ∇H(ξ). The challenge arises from the parameterization of the surface as H(ξ) = X_f(ξ) - X_d, where both X_f and X_d are matrices, complicating the derivative ∂H/∂ξ_j, which is also a matrix. The user seeks guidance on how to appropriately set up these constraints for optimization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear programming algorithms
  • Familiarity with gradient and tangent plane concepts
  • Knowledge of matrix calculus and parameterization of surfaces
  • Experience with optimization techniques in mathematical programming
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for vectorizing matrix derivatives in optimization problems
  • Explore advanced linear programming techniques for handling complex constraints
  • Study the implications of parameterized surfaces in optimization contexts
  • Learn about the role of boundary conditions in optimization solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, optimization specialists, and engineers involved in complex system modeling and linear programming applications will benefit from this discussion.

Kreizhn
Messages
714
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to minimize a function over a rather complicated surface. I'm using an algorithm that takes an initial guess, finds the tangent plane at that point, minimizes using a linear programming algorithm, then (tries to) project back onto the complicated surface.

More specifically, if \xi is a vector and H(\xi) is the surface, I want to solve the linear programming problem
\min c^T \xi, \quad \text{subject to } \nabla H(\xi) (\xi - \bar \xi) = 0
Now my problem is that I'm having trouble setting up the constraints. This wouldn't normally be difficult, except that my surface is parameterized as
H(\xi) = X_f(\xi) - X_d
where X_f, X_d are matrices.

Normally in these cases H(\xi) is at worst vector-valued and so \frac{\partial H}{\partial \xi_j} is a vector so that \nabla H(\xi) is a matrix. However in this case \frac{\partial H}{\partial \xi_j} is itself a matrix.

How do I handle this? Do I ``vectorize'' \frac{\partial H}{\partial \xi_j}? Do I break it into real and imaginary parts then vectorize? I'm not sure how to handle this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your surface consists of vectors or points shouldn't play a role. In the context they are points, however they look like. The condition is meant to constrain the set of all points, regardless its structure. The structure might play a role in the optimization process as it contains additional information which might be useful, e.g. the shape of the boundaries where the optimal solution is likely to be found.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K