Linear Transform: Proving Action Determined by Basis

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanielFaraday
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Transform
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a linear transformation T: U → V is fully determined by its action on a basis B = {u₁, u₂, ..., uₙ} of the domain U. The initial approach highlights that since a basis spans U and is linearly independent, the transformation T can be defined entirely by its effects on the basis vectors. A more rigorous proof is suggested, starting with the assumption that T(B) is known, allowing for the expression of T(u) for any vector u in U.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations and their properties
  • Familiarity with vector spaces and bases
  • Knowledge of linear independence and spanning sets
  • Basic proof techniques in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations in detail
  • Learn about vector space bases and their significance
  • Explore the concept of linear independence and spanning sets
  • Practice constructing rigorous proofs in linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, educators teaching vector spaces, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of linear transformations and their foundational proofs.

DanielFaraday
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove the following:

The action of a linear transformation [tex]T:U\rightarrow V[/tex] is completely determined by its action on a basis [tex]B=\left\{u_1,u_2,\text{...},u_n\right\}[/tex] for the domain U.

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, I feel like my solution is too simple. It doesn't feel rigorous enough, but I'm not sure how to improve it. Any ideas?

By definition, the linear transformation [tex]T:U\rightarrow V[/tex] only acts on the domain U. Also by definition, a basis of U must also span U and be linearly independent. Thus, U is completely determined by B, and in turn, T is completely determined by its action on B. QED
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You haven't really proven it yet.
I'd start by: suppose that T(B) is given, i.e. [itex]T(u_i) = v_i[/itex]. Let [itex]u \in U[/itex]. You should now be able to write down T(u).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K