Linear Transformation with Respect to Given Bases

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the matrix representation of a linear transformation T from R3 to M(2,2) with respect to specified bases B and C. The user calculated the matrix as [0 0 0 1; 0 0 0 -1; 1 -1 0 0] by applying the transformation to each vector in basis B and expressing the results in terms of basis C. There is some confusion regarding whether this matrix is correct or if it should be transposed. Participants confirm that the method used to derive the matrix is valid and affirm the approach for determining the image and kernel of the transformation. The conversation emphasizes clarity in understanding the transformation and its representation in different bases.
forty
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
Let T: R3 -> M(2,2) be the linear transformation given by

T(x,y,z) = [ z ...-z ]
.....[ 0 ... x-y]Fix bases B = {(1,0,0),(0,1,0),(0,0,1)} and C = { [1 0] , [0 1] , [0 0] , [0 0] }
............[0 0]...[0 0]...[1 0]...[0 1]for R3 and M(2,2) respectivelya) Find the matrix [T]c,b of T with respect to the bases B and C.
b) Use the matrix from part (a) to find the basis for Im(T)
c) Use the matrix from part (a) to find the basis for Ker(T)

For parts b and c I'm pretty sure that's just finding the column space (part b) and solution space (part c) of the matrix.

As for a its more so to do with my own confusion when it comes to bases.

I worked out the matrix to be [ 0 0 0 1 ]
...(3 by 4 matrix)...[ 0 0 0 -1]
.......[ 1 -1 0 0]

The way i got this was by taking each vector from B applying the transformation then writing it in terms of the basis C and then writing the coefficients of each matrix in the rows of the above matrix. I hope that even makes sense >_>.

Any help greatly appreciated :)

P.S. sorry for the garbagety matrices :SEDIT: Maybe its the transpose of that matrix... I am lost >.<
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the way you found the matrix certainly makes sense and, in fact, is the best way to do it. It is also true that "For parts b and c I'm pretty sure that's just finding the column space (part b) and solution space (part c) of the matrix."

Now, since you have done part (a) and know how to do parts (b) and (c), what is your question?
 
So the first matrix i got is correct?

[ 0 0 0 1 ]
[ 0 0 0 -1]
[ 1 -1 0 0]or is is the transpose of it?
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Back
Top