Linearizing tunnel diode equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter rjspurling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diode Linearizing
AI Thread Summary
To linearize the tunnel diode equation I = D.V.exp(-V/B), the logarithmic transformation leads to Ln(I) = Ln(D) + Ln(V) - V/B. The challenge arises from the V term preceding the exponential, making it difficult to graph directly. By rearranging the equation to Ln(I/V) = Ln(D) - V/B, the relationship can be plotted as Ln(I/V) against V. This allows for the determination of constants D and B, with Ln(D) as the y-intercept and -1/B as the gradient. The discussion emphasizes the importance of combining variables for effective graphing.
rjspurling
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I need to produce a linearized equation of the following,

I = D. V. exp(-V/B)
eq(1)​

I is the current
V is the voltage
D is a constant
B is a constant

Data was collected in an experiment designed to investigate the characteristics of a tunnel diode. I didn't do the experiment myself, I just have to find the linearized form of eq(1) and determine the constants D and B. I have a set of I values and a set of V values given to me to allow me to calculate the constants.

Homework Equations


I = D. V. exp(-V/B)
eq(1)​

The Attempt at a Solution


The problem I am having is the V term before the exponential term.

Taking logs of both sides,
Ln(I) = Ln(D) + Ln(V) - V/B
eq(2)​

I'm going to use excel to determine B and D. I'm just not sure how to graph it. If there was no V term before the exponential term then it would be,

Ln(I) = Ln(D) - V/B
eq(3)​

and i could simply graph Ln(I) vs V, and 1/B would be my gradient and Ln(D) would be my y-intercept. I can't do this for eq(2) though because of the Ln(V) term.

If I graphed Ln(I) vs Ln(v) - V, i can't determine B. I just can't seem to find a way to do it. I'm sure there's a simply way. I just need to work out how to bring the V's together.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi rjspurling! Welcome to PF! :smile:
rjspurling said:
Hi, I need to produce a linearized equation of the following,

I = D. V. exp(-V/B)

If I graphed Ln(I) vs Ln(v) - V, i can't determine B. I just can't seem to find a way to do it. I'm sure there's a simply way. I just need to work out how to bring the V's together.

Stop trying to keep I and V separate …

you're allowed to mix-and-match! :wink:

Hint: you want an equation with B on the LHS, and a fraction on the RHS. :smile:
 
argh mixing, of course!

Ln(I) = Ln(D) + Ln(V) - V/B

Ln(I) - Ln(V) = Ln(D) - V/B

Ln(I/V) = Ln(D) - V/B

Ln(I/V) vs V

Ln(D) is the y-intercept.

-1/B is the gradient.

I think that's it.

Thanks tiny-tim! much appreciated.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top